The architecture and the implementation of a finite state pronunciation lexicon for Turkish

Computer Speech and Language

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 80-106

  Oflazer, Kemal ^a   Inkelas, Sharon ^b  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; STANDARDS; WORD PROCESSING;

FINITE STATE TECHNOLOGY; PRONUNCIATION LEXICON; PRONUNCIATION REPRESENTATION; TURKISH;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 27744599256     PISSN: 08852308     EISSN: 10958363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2005.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K.R. Beesley, and L. Karttunen Finite State Morphology 2003 CSLI Publications Stanford University
2. G.N. Clements, and E. Sezer Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish H. van der Hulst N. Smith The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II 1982 Foris Dordrecht 213 255
3. Gibbon, D., Simoes, A.P.Q., Matthiesen, M., 2000. An optimised FS pronunciation resource generator for highly inflecting languages. In: Proceedings of LREC 2000. Athens, Greece.
4. D. Hakkani-Tür, K. Oflazer, and G. Tür Statistical morphological disambiguation for agglutinative languages Computers and the Humanities 36 4 2002
5. J. Hankamer Morphological parsing and the lexicon W. Marslen-Wilson Lexical Representation and Process 1989 MIT Press
6. Hazen, T.J., Hetherington, I.L., Shu, H., Livescu, K., September 2002. Pronunciation modeling using a finite-state transducer representation. In: Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Pronunciation Modeling and Lexicon Adaptation. Estes Park, Colorado.
7. S. Inkelas Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: representations vs. the grammar R. Kager H. vanderHulst W. Zonneveld The Prosody-morphology Interface 1999 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 134 187
8. S. Inkelas, and C.O. Orgun Turkish stress: a review Phonology 20 1 2003
9. D. Jurafsky, and J.H. Martin Speech and Language Processing 2000 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
10. Karttunen, L., 1993. Finite-state lexicon compiler. XEROX, Palo Alto Research Center- Technical Report.
11. L. Karttunen Applications of finite-state transducers in natural language processing S. Yu A. Paun Implementation and Application of Automata. No. 2008 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2001 Springer Verlag Heidelberg 34 46
12. Karttunen, L., Beesley, K.R., 1992. Two-level rule compiler. Technical Report, XEROX Palo Alto Research Center.
13. L. Karttunen, J.-P. Chanod, G. Grefenstette, and A. Schiller Regular expressions for language engineering Natural Language Engineering 2 4 1996 305 328
14. P. Kiparsky The inflectional accent in Indo-European Language 49 1973 794 849
15. Kornfilt, J., 1997. Turkish. Routledge, London.
16. Koskenniemi, K., 1983. Two-level morphology: a general computational model for word form recognition and production. Publication No: 11, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.
17. Külekçi, O., 2004. Morphological disambiguation with distinguishing tags and its application to disambiguation of pronunciation, Ph.D Thesis Proposal, SabancI University, Istanbul, Turkey.
18. K. Oflazer Two-level description of Turkish morphology Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 2 1994 137 148
19. K. Oflazer, and G. Tür Combining hand-crafted rules and unsupervised learning in constraint-based morphological disambiguation E. Brill K. Church Proceedings of the ACL-SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 1996
20. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Tech. Rep. RuCCS-TR-2, Rutgers University, ROA-537.
21. E. Sezer On non-final stress in Turkish Journal of Turkish Studies 5 1981 61 69
22. R. Sproat Morphology and Computation 1992 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
23. H. van der Hulst, and J. van de Weijer Topics in Turkish phonology H. Boeschoten L. Verhoeven Turkish Linguistics Today 1991 E.J. Brill