Opportunistic adaptation in start-up companies

International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management

Volumn 3, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 546-562

  Andrén, Linda ^a   Magnusson, Mats ^a   Sjölander, Sören ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

business model; cognition; dynamic capabilities; entrepreneurship; learning; mobile internet; opportunistic adaptation; resource based; start up companies; vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744591122     PISSN: 1368275X     EISSN: 17415098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijeim.2003.003942     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bhave, M.P. (1994) ‘A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 9, pp.223–242.
2. Gartner, W.B., Bird, B. and Starr, J.A. (1992) ‘Acting as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organisational behaviour’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring, pp.13–31.
3. Quinn, R.E. (1985) ‘Managing innovation: controlled chaos’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No 3, pp.73–84.
4. Nicholls-Nixon, C.L., Cooper, A.C. and Woo, C.Y. (2000) ‘Strategic experimentation: understanding changes and performance in new ventures’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, pp.493–521.
5. Bhidé, A. (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses, New York, Oxford University Press.
6. Brown, T.E., Davidsson, P. and Wiklund, J. (2001) ‘An operationalisation of Stevenson's conceptualisation of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behaviour’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp.953–968.
7. Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
8. Grant, R.M. (1991) ‘The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation’, California Management Review, Spring, pp.114–135.
9. Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp.171–180.
10. The definitions of resources and capabilities used here are the ones proposed by Amit and Schoemaker [11]. They define resources as stocks of available factors that are owned or controlled by the firm. Resources are converted into final products or services by using a wide range of other firm assets. Resources consist of competence (IPR, technology, knowledge and skills), capital, material, and labour. Capabilities refer to a firm's capacity to deploy resources. The capabilities are information-based tangible or intangible processes that are firm specific and developed over time through complex interaction among the firm's resources.
11. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.J. (1993) ‘Strategic assets and organisational rent’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp.33–46.
12. The strategic assets of a firm consist of a subset of difficult to trade and imitate, scarce, appropriable and specialised resources and capabilities that bestow the firm’s competitive advantage [11].
13. Strategic industry factors are the set of resources and capabilities that has become the prime determinant of economic rents for industry participants [11].
14. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000) ‘Dynamic capabilities: what are they?’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp.1105–1121.
15. Foss, N.J. (1998) ‘The resource-based perspective: an assessment and diagnosis of problems’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.133–149.
16. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989) ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp.1504–1511.
17. Lei, D.T. (1997) ‘Competence-building, technology fusion and competitive advantage: the key roles of organisational learning and strategic alliances’, International Journal Of Technology Management, Vol. 14, No. 2/3/4, pp.208–237.
18. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp.509–533.
19. Baron, R.A. (1998) ‘Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, pp.275–294.
20. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp.111–125.
21. Edlund, M. and Magnusson, M.G. (forthcoming) ‘The influence of the dominant management logic on an internal corporate venture’, Scandinavian Journal of Management.
22. Prahalad, C.K. and Bettis, R.A. (1986) ‘The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp.485–501.
23. Fransman, M. (1994) ‘Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.49–67.
24. Witt, U. (1998) ‘Imagination and leadership – the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm’, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation, Vol. 35, pp.161–177.
25. Penrose, E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Wiley, New York.
26. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Hill, R.C. and Levenhagen, M. (1995) ‘Metaphors and mental models: sensemaking and sensegiving in innovation and entrepreneurial activities’, Journal of Management, 21, No. 6, pp.1057–1074.
28. Sjölander, S., Magnusson, M., Johansson, M. and Andrén, L. (2001) ‘Evolution, adaptation and entrepreneurial learning in the emerging Nordic wireless internet industry’, Paper presented at the First International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Learning, June 21–24, Naples, Italy.
29. Companies included in the study are companies, primarily in Sweden, whose main business idea and existence are regarded as ‘the infrastructure enabling wireless access to information and services distributed via the internet and, thereby, making information and services available to the user, regardless of time and location’.
30. Björkdahl, J., Bohlin, E. and Lindmark, S. (2001) ‘Policy and market implications of mobile internet – a survey of critical issues’, Vinnova.
31. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988) ‘Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organisation’, Research Policy, Vol. 17, pp.251–267.
32. Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997) ‘The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organisations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, pp.1–34.
33. Lester, R.K., Piore, M.J. and Malek, K.M. (1998) ‘Interpretive management: what general managers can learn from design’, Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.86–96.
34. Shane, S. (2000) ‘Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities’, Organisation Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp.448–469.
35. Cooper, A.C., Gimeno-Gascon, F.J. and Woo, C.Y. (1994) ‘Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 9, pp.371–395.
36. Teece, D.J. (1998) ‘Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets’, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.55–79.
37. Foss, N.J. (1999) ‘Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 15, pp.1–15.
38. Lorenzoni, G. and Lipparini, A. (1999) ‘The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organisational capability: a longitudinal study’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp.317–338.