Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 173-183

  Zupan, Lionel H ^a,b   Merfeld, Daniel M ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Graviceptors; Human; Ocular torsion; Spatial orientation; Tilt perception

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; FORCE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SUPINE POSITION;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; EYE DISEASES; FEMALE; GRAVITY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; OTOLITHIC MEMBRANE; PROPRIOCEPTION; REFLEX, VESTIBULO-OCULAR; ROTATION; SUPINE POSITION; TORSION;

EID: 27744589899     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. D. Angelaki, Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. III. Responses to translation, J Neurophysiol 80 (1998), 680-695.
2. D. Angelaki et al., Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information, J Neurosci 19(1) (1999), 316-327.
3. D.E. Angelaki et al., Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion, Nature 430(6999) (2004), 560-564.
4. A. Arrott, Torsional eye movements in man during linear accelerations, 1982, MIT: Cambridge, MA.
5. A.P. Arrott and L.R. Young, Attenuation of the otolith-ocular torsion reflex by changing orientation with respect to gravity, in 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. 1983: Boston, MA, Nov. 6-11.
6. H. Aubert, Eine Scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links, Virchows Arch 20 (1861), 381-393.
7. M. Barnett-Cowan, R. Dyde and L. Harris, Is an internal model of head orientation necessary for oculomotor control? Ann NY Acad Sci 19 (2005), 314-324.
8. G.A. Betts and I.S. Curthoys, Visually perceived vertical and visually perceived horizontal are not orthogonal, Vision Res 38(13) (1998), 1989-1999.
9. U.J. Bucher, F. Mast and N. Bischof, An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body positions in three dimensional space, Journal of Vestibular Research 2 (1992), 213-220.
10. P. Caines, Linear Stochastic systems, 1988, Toronto: Wiley.
11. A.H. Clarke, A. Engelhorn and H. Scherer, Ocular counterrolling in response to asymmetric radial acceleration, Acta Otolaryngol 116(5) (1996), 652-656.
12. H. Collewijn et al., Human ocular counterroll: Assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings, Experimental Brain Research 59 (1985), 185-196.
13. S.G. Diamond and C.H. Markham, Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function, Neurology 33(11) (1983), 1460-1469.
14. C. Fernandez and J. Goldberg, Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating the otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III, Response dynamics, J Neurophysiol 39 (1976), 996-1008.
15. S. Glasauer, Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith, Ann NY Acad Sci 656 (1992), 847-849.
16. S. Glasauer, Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion, Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520(Pt 1) (1995), 37-40.
17. A.M. Green and D.E. Angelaki, Resolution of sensory ambiguities for gaze stabilization requires a second neural integrator, J Neurosci 23(28) (2003), 9265-9275.
18. A.M. Green and D.E. Angelaki, An integrative neural network for detecting inertial motion and head orientation, J Neurophysiol 92(2) (2004), 905-925.
19. J. Holly, Three-dimensional baselines for perceived self-motion during acceleration and deceleration in a centrifuge, Journal of Vestibular Research 7(1) (1997), 45-61.
20. I. Howard, Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation, Vision Research 4 (1964), 433-437.
21. R.A. Johnson and D.W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 1982, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
22. R.S. Kellogg, Dynamic counterrolling of the eye in normal subjects and in persons with bilateral labyrinthine defects, in The Role of the Vestibular Organs in the Exploration of Space, 1965, US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. 195-202.
23. B.K. Lichtenberg, L.R. Young and A.P. Arrott, Human ocular counterrolling induced by varying linear accelerations, Experimental Brain Research 48 (1982), 127-136.
24. C. Markham, Anatomy and physiology of otolith-controlled ocular counterrolling, Acta Oto Suppl 468 (1989), 263-266.
25. C.H. Markham, M.S. Estes and R.H. Blanks, Vestibular influences on ocular accommodation in cats, Equilibrium Research 3 (1973), 102-115.
26. D. Merfeld et al., The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion, Experimental Brain Research 110 (1996), 315-321.
27. D.M. Merfeld, Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation, Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520 (1995), 354-359.
28. D.M. Merfeld, L.H. Zupan and C.A. Gifford, Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation, J Neurophysiol 85 (2001), 1648-1660.
29. D.M. Merfeld and L.H. Zupan, Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses, J Neurophysiol 87(2) (2002), 819-833.
30. D.M. Merfeld et al., Qualitatively different strategies are used to elicit reflexive and cognitive responses, J. Ves. Res. 14 (2004), 109-110.
31. H. Mittelstaedt, A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical, Naturwissenschaften 70 (1983), 272-281.
32. G. Paige and D. Tomko, Eye Movement Responses to Linear Head Motion in the Squirrel Monkey. I. Basic Characteristics, J Neurophysiol 65(5) (1991), 1170-1182.
33. E. Schneider, S. Glasauer and M. Dieterich, Central processing of human ocular torsion analyzed by galvanic Vestibular stimulation, Neuroreport 11(7) (2000), 1559-1563.
34. S. Seidman, L. Telford and G. Paige, Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration, Exp Brain Res 119 (1998), 307-314.
35. J. Suzuki, K. Tokumasu and K. Goto, Eye movements from single utricular nerve stimulation in the cat, Acta Otolaryngol 68 (1969), 350-362.
36. L. Telford, S. Seidman and G. Paige, Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance, J Neurophysiol 78 (1997), 1775-1790.
37. A.D. Van Beuzekom and J.A. Van Gisbergen, Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates, J Neurophysiol 84(1) (2000), 11-27.
38. S. Wade and I. Curthoys, The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli, Vision Research 37(8) (1997), 1071-1078.
39. S. Wearne, T. Raphan and B. Cohen, Contribution of vestibular commissural pathways to spatial orientation of the angular vestibuloocular reflex, J Neurophysiol 78(2) (1997), 1193-1197.
40. R.C. Woellner and A. Graybiel, Counterrolling of the eyes and its dependence on the magnitude of gravitational or inertial force acting laterally on the body, Journal of Applied Physiology 14(4) (1959), 632-634.
41. L. Young, Perception of the body in space: mechanisms, in Handbook of Physiology - The Nervous System, I. Darian-Smith, Editor. 1984, American Physiological Society: Bethesda, Maryland, 1023-1066.
42. L.R. Young et al., Ocular torsion on Earth and in weightlessness, Ann NY Acad Sci 374 (1981), 80-92.
43. L.H. Zupan, D.M. Merfeld and C. Darlot, Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements, Biol Cybern 86(3) (2002), 209-230.