Using the null-stream of GEO 600 to veto transient events in the detector output

Classical and Quantum Gravity

Volumn 22, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 4903-4912

  Hewitson, M ^a   Ajith, P ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744588623     PISSN: 02649381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/22/22/015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Smith J R et al 2004 Commissioning, characterization, and operation of the dual-recycled GEO 600 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S1737-45
2. Heinzel G et al 2002 Dual recycling for GEO 600 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 1547
3. Grote H, Freise A, Malec M, Heinzel G, Willke B, Lück H, Strain K A, Hough J and Danzmann K 2004 Dual recycling for GEO 600 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S473-80
4. Hewitson M, Grote H, Heinzel G, Strain K A, Ward H and Weiland U 2003 Calibration of the power-recycled gravitational wave detector, GEO600 Rev. Sci. Iustrum. 74 4184
5. Hewitson M, Heinzel G, Smith J R, Strain K A and Ward H 2004 Principles of calibrating the dual-recycled GEO 600 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 4702
6. Hewitson M, Grote H, Hild S, Lück H, Ajith P, Smith J R, Strain K A, Willke B and Woan G Optimal time-domain combination of the two calibrated output quadratures of GEO 600 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 4253
7. Kotter K, Heng I S, Hewitson M, Strain K A, Woan G and Ward H 2003 PQMon: a powerful veto for burstn events Class. Quantum Grav. 20 S895-902
8. Christensen N, Shawhan P and Gonzalez G (for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2004 Vetoes for inspiral triggers in LIGO data Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S1747-55
9. Christensen N (for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2005 Veto studies for LIGO inspiral triggers Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S1059-68
10. Di Credico A (for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration) 2005 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses Class. Quantum Grav. 22 S1051-8
11. Ajith P, Hewitson M and Smith J R et al 2005 Instrumental vetoes for gravitational wave burst triggers using noise projections, in preparation
12. 2 testing of optimal filters for gravitational wave signals: an experimental implementation Phys. Rev. D D 61 102001
13. Itoh Y, Papa M A, Krishnan B and Siemens X 2004 Chi-square test on candidate events from CW signal coherent searches Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S1667-77
14. Shawhan P and Ochsner E 2004 A new waveform consistency test for gravitational wave inspirai searches Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S1757-65
15. 2 time-frequency discriminator for gravitational wave detection Phys. Rev. D D 71 062001
16. Babak S, Grote H, Hewitson M, Lück H and Strain K A 2005 Signal based vetoes for the detection of gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries Phys. Rev. D D 72 022002
17. Gürsel Y and Tinto M 1989 Near optimal solution to the inverse problem for gravitational-wave bursts Phys. Rev. D D 40 3884-938
18. Heng I S, Balasubramanian R, Sathyaprakash B S and Schutz B F 2004 First steps towards characterizing the hierarchical algorithm for curves and ridges pipeline Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S821
19. Balasubramanian R, Grote H, Heng I S, Hewitson M, Lück H, Smith J R, Strain K A, Ward H and Willke B 2005 Results from the first burst hardware injections performed on GEO 600 Class. Quantum Grav. 22 3015-28