Three-dimensional measurement of intervertebral kinematics in vitro using optical motion analysis

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 219, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 393-399

  Holt, C A ^a   Evans, S L ^a   Dillon, D ^b   Ahuja, S ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anterior and posterior spine instrumentation; Intervertebral kinematics; Spinal construct stiffness; Spine; Three dimensional kinematics; Vertebrectomy

Indexed keywords

BONE; CAMERAS; KINEMATICS; LIGAMENTS; STIFFNESS; JOINTS (ANATOMY); MOTION ANALYSIS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; SCREWS;

ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR SPINE INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL KINEMATICS; POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT (PLL); SPINAL CONSTRUCT STIFFNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS; VERTEBRECTOMY;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PLATE; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; CATTLE; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; SPINE FUSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PLATES; BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; CATTLE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR SPINE INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL KINEMATICS; SPINAL CONSTRUCT STIFFNESS; SPINE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS; VERTEBRECTOMY;

EID: 27744584854     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 09544119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/095441105X34374     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Goel, V. K. and Gibertson, L. G. Applications of finite element method to thoracolumbar spinal research - past, present, and future. Spine, 1995, 15, 1719-1727.
2. Lavaste, F., Skalli, W., Robin, S., Roy-Camille, R., and Mazel, C. Three-dimensional geometrical and mechanical modelling of the lumbar spine. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25(10), 1153-1164.
3. Skalli, W., Robin, S., Lavaste, F., and Dubousset, J. A biomechanical analysis of short segment fixation using a three-dimensional geometric and mechanical model. Spine, 1993, 18(5), 536-545.
4. Calisse, J., Rohlman, A., and Bergmann, G. Estimation of trunk muscle forces using the finite element method and in-vivo loads measured by telemeterised internal spinal fixation devices. J. Biomechanics, 1999, 32, 727-731.
5. Gregersen, G. G. and Lucas, D. B. An in-vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1967, 49A(2), 247-262.
6. Steffen, T., Rubin, R. K, Baramki, H. G., Antoniou, J., Marchesi, D., and Aebi, M. A new technique for measuring lumbar segmented motion in-vivo. Spine, 1997, 22(2), 156-166.
7. Faber, M. J., Schamhardt, H. C., and van Weeren, P. R. Determination of 3D spinal kinematics without defining a local vertebral coordinate system. J. Biomechanics, 1999, 32, 1355-1358.
8. Lee, R. Y. W. Kinematics of rotational mobilisation of the lumbar spine. Clin. Biomechanics, 2001, 16, 481-488.
9. Coates, J. E., McGregor, A. H., Beith, I. D., and Hughes, S. P F.. The influence of initial resting posture on range of motion of the lumbar spine. Manual Therapy, 2001, 6(3), 139-144.
10. Goel, V. K., Clark, C. R., McGowan, D., and Goyal, S. An in-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilised cervical spine. J. Biomechanics, 1984, 17(5), 363-376.
11. Gunzberg, R., Hutton, W., and Fraser, R. Axial rotation of the lumbar spine and the effect of flexion - an in-vitro and in-vivo biomechanical study. Spine, 1991, 16(l), 22-28.
12. Panjabi, M. M., Abumi, K., Duranceau, J., and Crisco, J. J. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal instrumentations: Part II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices. Spine, 1988, 13, 1135-1140.
13. Wilke, H.-J., Krischak, S., and Claes, L. Biomechanical comparison of calf and human spines. J. Orthop. Res., 1996, 14(3), 500-503.
14. Dick, J. C., Zdeblick, T. A., Bartel, B. D., and Kunz, D. N. Mechanical evaluation of cross-link designs in rigid pedical screw systems. Spine, 1997, 22(4), 370-375.
15. Goertzen, D. J., Lane, C., and Oxland, T. R. Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in-vitro porcine investigation. J. Biomechanics, 2004, 37, 257-261.
16. Wilke, H.-J., Claes, L., Schmitt, H., and Wolf, S. A universal spine tester for in-vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur. Spine J., 1994, 3,91-97.
17. Stokes, I. A., Gardner-Morse, M., Churchill, D., and Laible, J. P. Measurement of a spinal motion segment stiffness matrix. J. Biomechanics, 2002, 35, 517-521.
18. Kim, Y. H. and Kim, K. Musculoskeletal modelling of the lumbar spine under follower loads. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Science and its Applications (ICCSA 2004), Part 2, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3044, 2004, pp. 467-475 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
19. Patwardhan, A. G., Havey, R. M., Ghanayem, A. J., Diener, H., Meade, K. O., Dunlap, B., and Hodges, S. D. Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine, 2000, 25(12), 1548-1554.
20. Holt, C. A., Hayes, N. J., van Deursen, R. W. M., and O'Callaghan, P. O. Three-dimensional analysis of the tibiofemoral joint using external marker clusters and the JCS approach - Comparison of normal and osteoarthritic knee function. In Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2001, Vol. 3, pp. 289-294 (Gordon and Breach, New York).
21. Soderkvist, I. and Wedin, P.-A. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26(12), 1473-1477.
22. Grood, E. S. and Suntay, W. J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1983, 105,136-144.