The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 218-232

  Ho, Kimberly M ^a   Weiss, Shelley J ^b   Garrett, Kathryn L ^c   Lloyd, Lyle L ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWAAC Consulting   (United States)

^c DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); Communication book; Conversational facilitation; Global aphasia; Pictographic symbols; Remnant book

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR NONVOCAL PERSONS; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; PHOTOGRAPHY; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION (AAC); COMMUNICATION INTERACTION; CONVERSATIONAL FACILITATION; GLOBAL APHASIA; PICTOGRAPHIC BOOKS; PICTOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS; REMNANT BOOKS;

HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING;

EID: 27744582298     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: 14773848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07434610400016694     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
2. Bellaire, K. J., Georges, J. B., & Thompson, C. K. (1991). Establishing functional communication board use for nonverbal aphasic subjects. Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 219-227.
3. Beck, A. R., & Fritz, H. (1998). Can individuals who have aphasia learn iconic codes? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 184-196.
4. Bertoni, B., Stoffel, A., & Weneger, D. (1991). Communicating with pictographs: A graphic approach to the improvement of communicative interactions. Aphasiology, 5, 341-353.
5. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda. P. (1998). AAC strategies for beginning communicators-Symbolic approaches to communication). In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentation and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 295-329). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6. Beukelman, D. R., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1985). Communicative augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. Austin. TX: Pro-Ed.
7. Boller, F., Cole, M., Vrtunski, P., Patterson, M., & Kim, Y. (1979). Paralinguistic aspects of auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and language, 7, 164-174.
8. Boser, K. I., & Weinrich, M. (1998). Functional categories in agrammatic production: Evidence for access to tense projections. Brain and Language, 65, 207-210.
9. Chenery, H. J., Ingram, J. C. L., & Murdoch, B. E. (1990). Automatic and vocational semantic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 38, 215-232.
10. Coelho, C., & Duffy, R. J. (1987). The relationship of the acquisition of manual signs to severity of aphasia: A training study. Brain and Language, 31, 328-345.
11. Fox, L. E., & Fried-Oken, M. (1996). AAC aphasiology: Partnership for future research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 257-271.
12. Fox, L. E., Sohlberg, M. M., & Fried-Oken, M. (2001). Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of an augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 171-200.
13. Funnell, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Communicating with blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 279-300.
14. Gardner, H., Zurif, E., Berry, T., & Baker, E. (1976). Visual communication in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 14, 275 292.
15. Garrett, K. L. (1993). Changes in the interaction patterns of individuals with severe aphasia given three types of partner support. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
16. Garrett, K. (1996, August). AAC interventions and aphasia: Cognitive-linguistic considerations. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, Canada.
17. Garrett, K. L., & Beukelman, D. R. (1992). Augmentative and alternative communication approaches for individuals with severe aphasia. In K. M. Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative and alternative communication in the medical setting (pp. 245-321). Communication Skill Builders: Tucson, AZ.
18. Garrett, K. L., & Beukelman, D. R. (1998). Adults with severe aphasia. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 465-499). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19. Garrett, K., Beukelman, D., & Low-Morrow, D. (1989). A comprehensive augmentative communication system for an adult with Broca's aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 55-61.
20. Garrett, K., & Huth, C. (2002). The impact of graphic contextual information and instruction on the conversational behaviors of an individual with severe aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 16, 523-536.
21. Garrett, K., & Kimelman, M. (2000). Cognitive-linguistic considerations in the application of alternative communication strategies for aphasia. In D., Beukelman, K., Yorkston, & J. Reichle, (Eds.), Augmentative communication for adults with neurogenic and neuromuscular disabilities (pp. 339-374). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Media, PA: Williams & Wilkins.
23. Helm-Estabrooks, N., Ramsberger, G., Morgan, A., & Nicholas, M. (1989b). Boston assessment of severe aphasia. Chicago: Riverside Press.
24. Kagan, A. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2, 15-28.
25. Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Keenan, E., & Schieffetin, B. (1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversation of children and adults. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 336-384). New York: Academic Press.
27. Koul, R., & Harding, R. (1998). Identification and production of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a software application. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 11-23.
28. Koul, R., & Corwin, M. (2003). Efficacy of-AAC intervention in individuals with chronic severe aphasia. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative Communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 449-470). New York: Academic Press.
29. Koul, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1998). Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language, 62, 398-421.
30. Landis, T., Graves, R., & Goodglass, H. (1982). Aphasic reading and writing: Possible evidence for right hemisphere participation. Cortex, 18, 105-112.
31. Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66-82.
32. Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186-203.
33. Lund, S., & Light, J. (1999, November). AAC symbol learning. There's more to it than just iconicity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. McCall, D., Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., & Cox, D. (2000). The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia. Aphasiology, 14, 795-826.
35. Osberg, J. S., Haley, S. M., McGinnis, G. E., & DeJong, G. (1990). Characteristics of cost outliers who did not benefit from stroke rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 117-125.
36. MacWhinney, B. (2001). From CHILDES to Talk Bank. In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M. Eveizaberrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition (pp. 17-34). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla.
37. McNeil, M. (1983) Aphasia: Neurological considerations. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 1-19.
38. Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The picture communication symbols. Book III. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Company.
39. Nicholas, M., Elliot, S., Baker, E., & Weiss, S. (1994, November). Computerized AAC system for severe aphasia. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
40. Reuterskiold, C. (1991). The effects of emotionality on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Cortex, 27, 595-604. Rogers, M., Schegel, E., Alacron, N., Olswang, L., &
41. Rogers, M., Schegel, E., Alacron, N., Olswang, L., & Klingenberg, M. (1999, May). Quantifying the quality of communication between individuals with aphasia and conversational partners. Paper presented at meeting of the Clinical Aphasiotogy Conference, Santa Fe, NM.
42. Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for individuals with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161-170.
43. Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1996). Differentiating globally aphasic patients: Data from in-depth language assessments and production training using C-VIC. Aphasiology, 10, 319-342.
44. Steele, R. D., Kleczewska, M. K., Carlson, G. S., & Weinrich, M. (1992). Computers in the rehabilitation of chronic, severe aphasia: C-VIC 2.0 cross-modal studies. Aphasiology, 6, 185-194.
45. The United States General Accounting Office (GAO). (1996). Skilled nursing facilities: Approval process for certain services may result in higher Medicare costs (No. GAO/HEHS-97-18). Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
46. Van Lancker, D., & Nicklay, C. (1992). Comprehension of personally relevant (PERL) versus novel language in two globally aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 6, 37-61.
47. Wallace, G., & Canter, G. (1985). Effects of individually relevant language materials on the performance of severely aphasic individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 385-390.
48. Waaland, P. K. (1998). Families of children with traumatic brain injury. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 345-368). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
49. Weinrich, M., Baser, K. I., McCall, D., & Bishop, V. (2001). Training agrammatic subjects on passive sentences: Implications for syntactic deficit theories. Brain and Language, 76, 45-61.
50. Weinrich, M., McCall, D., Shoosmith, L, Thomas, K., Katzenberger, K., & Weber, C. (1993). Locative prepositional phrases in severe aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 21-45.
51. Weinrich, M., Shelton, J. R., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1997). Generalization from single sentence to multi-sentence production in severely aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 58, 327-352.
52. Weiss, S., & Ho, K. (1997, November). Remnant books in Aphasia: AAC strategies for patients in the acute rehabilitation setting. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, Boston, MA.
53. Wood, L. A., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D. R., & Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 261-267.