Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose - Response curves

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 204-215

  Gottschalk, Paul G ^a   Dunn, John R ^a  

^a Brendan Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

5PL; Dose response curve; Dose estimate; Five parameter logistic; Monte Carlo method; Precision profile; Weighted regression

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; ERROR ANALYSIS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DOSE - RESPONSE CURVE; FIVE PARAMETER LOGISTIC; PRECISION PROFILE; WEIGHTED REGRESSION;

TELEMEDICINE;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DOSE CALCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; IMMUNOASSAY; MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 27744580694     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. David Wild The Immunoassay Handbook 1994 Stockton New York
2. R.A. Dudley, P. Edwards, R.P. Ekins, D.J. Finney, IG.M. McKenzie, G.M. Raab, D. Rodbard, and R.P.C. Rodgers Guidelines for immunoassay data processing Clin. Chem. 31/8 1985 1264 1271
3. D.J. Finney Statistical Methods in Biological Assays third ed. 1978 Charles Griffin London
4. P.G. Gottschalk, and J.R. Dunn The five parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four parameter logistic Anal. Biochem. 343 2005 54 65
5. P.G. Gottschalk, and J.R. Dunn Measuring parallelism, linearity and relative potency in bioassay and immunoassay data J. Biopharm. Stat. 15 2005 437 463
6. K.F. Karpinski Optimality assessment in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELIZA) Biometrics 46 1990 381 390
7. C. Kay, A.B.J. Nix, K.W. Kemp, R.J. Rowlands, G. Richards, G.V. Groom, K. Griffiths, and D.W. Wilson Dose interpolation of immunoassay data: uncertainties associated with curve-fitting Stat. Med. 5 1986 183 192
8. N.R. Draper, and H. Smith Applied Regression Analysis third ed. 1998 Wiley New York
9. A.A. Fernandez, G.W. Stevenson, G.E. Abraham, and N.Y. Chiamori Interrelations of the various mathematical approaches to radioimmunoassay Clin. Chem. 29/2 1983 284 289
10. G.M. Raab Estimation of a variance function, with application to immunoassay Appl. Stat. 3 1 1981 32 40
11. M. Davidian, R.J. Carroll, and W. Smith Variance functions and the minimum detectable concentration in assays Biometrika 75/3 1988 549 556
12. D.J. Finney, and P. Phillips The form and estimation of a variance function, with particular reference to immunoassay Appl. Stat. 26 1977 312 320
13. D. Rodbard Statistical estimation of the minimal detectable concentration ("sensitivity") for radioligand assays Anal. Biochem. 90 1978 1 12
14. Brendan Technologies, Inc., StatLIA 3.2 Reference Manual, Carlsbad CA: Brendan Technologies, Inc., 2004 (www.brendan.com ).
15. W.B. Davenport Probability and Random Processes 1970 McGraw-Hill New York p. 252