The role of technological development and policies in a post-Kyoto climate regime

Climate Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 291-308

  Philibert, Cédric ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY   (France)

Author keywords

Diffusion and transfer; Post kyoto; Technology; Technology agreements

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; KYOTO PROTOCOL; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 27744576344     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2005.9685559     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Asuka, J., and Takeuchi, K., 2004. Additionality reconsidered:lax criteria may not benefit developing countries. Climate Policy, 4:177–192.
2. Barrett, S., 2003. Environment and Statecraft. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
3. Baumert, K., Perkaus, J. F., and Kete, N., 2003. Great expectations:can international emissions trading deliver an equitable climate regime?. Climate Policy, 3 (2):107–187.
4. Benedick, R. E., 2001. Striking a new deal on climate change Issues in Science and Technology (online), Fall[available at http://www.issues.org/issues/18.1/benedick.html]
5. Bodansky, D., 2003. “ Climate commitments:assessing the options. ”. In Beyond Kyoto:Advancing the International Effort Against Climate Change. Edited by:Aldy, J. E., 37–60. Arlington, VA:Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
6. Bosni, M., and Ellis, J., 2005. Exploring options for sectoral crediting mechanisms. IEA/OECD Information paper Paris
7. Buchner, B., Carraro, C., Cersosimo, I., and Marchiori, C., 2003. Back to Kyoto? US Participation and the Linkage between R&D and Climate Cooperation. Venice, Italy:Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
8. Chan-Woo, K., 2002. Negotiations on climate change:Debates on commitment of developing countries and possible responses. 42–60. East Asia Review 14
9. Charnovitz, S., 2003. Trade and Climate:Potential Conflicts and Synergies, in Aldy et al., Beyond Kyoto—Advancing the international effort against climate change. Arlington, VA:Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
10. Chen, Y., 2003. Chinese perspectives on beyond-2012. Presentation at the open symposium, International Climate Regime Beyond 2012:Issues and Challenges, October 7 Japan:Tokyo.
11. Chung, R., October 2003. CDM-linked voluntary dynamic target. October, Jeju Island, South Korea:Presentation at the CCAP's Dialogues on Future Actions and Clean Development Mechanism.
12. Dasgupta, C., and Kelkar, U., 2003. Indian perspectives on beyond-2012. Presentation at the open symposium, International Climate Regime Beyond 2012:Issues and Challenges, October 7 Japan:Tokyo.
13. Edmonds, J. A., 1999. “ Beyond Kyoto:toward a technology greenhouse strategy. ”. Consequences5(1), 17–28[available at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol5no1/beyond.html]
14. Edmonds, J. A., 2002. “ Atmospheric stabilization:technology needs, opportunities, and timing. ”. In U.S. Policy and the Global Environment:Memos to the President. Edited by:Kennedy, D., and Riggs, J. A., 46–71. Aspen, CO:The Aspen Institute.
15. 2 ”. In International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change. Edited by:Carraro, C., 131–154. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Ellerman, D. A., and Wing, I. S., 2003. Absolute versus intensity-based emission caps. Climate Policy, 3 [Supplement 2], S7–S20.
17. Ellis, J., Winkler, H., and Morlot, J., 2004. Taking stock of progress under the CDM. OECD/IEA Information Paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)4.
18. Gagnon-Lebrun, F., 2004. Cooperation in agriculture:R&D on high-yielding crop varieties. International Technology Cooperation Case Study 2. OECD/IEA Information Paper, COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)9.
19. Grubb, M., Hope, C., and Fouquet, R., 2002. Climatic implications of the Kyoto Protocol:the contribution of international spillover. Climatic Change, 54:11–28.
20. Heller, T. C., and Shukla, P. R., 2003. “ Development and climate:engaging developing countries. ”. In Beyond Kyoto:Advancing the International Effort Against Climate Change. Edited by:Aldy, J. E., 111–140. Arlington, VA:Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
21. Hoffert, M. I., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., Criswell, D. R., Green, C., Herzog, H., Jain, A. K., Kheshgi, H. S., Lackner, K. S., Lewis, J. S., Lightfoot, H. D., Manheimer, W., Mankins, J. C., Mauel, M. E., Perkins, L. J., Schlesinger, M. E., Volk, T., and Wigley, T. M.L., 2002. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability:energy for a greenhouse planet. Nature, 298:981–987.
22. Hourcade, J.-C., and Shukla, P., 2001. “ Global, regional, and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation. ”. In Climate Change 2001:Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by:Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., and Pan, J., Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Ch. 8
23. IEA. 2000. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris:OECD/IEA.
24. IEA. 2002. Beyond Kyoto:Energy Dynamics and Climate Stabilisation. Paris:OECD/IEA.
25. IEA. 2003. Cool Appliances:Policy Strategies for Energy-Efficient Homes. Paris:OECD/IEA.
26. Martin, J.-M., 1988. L'intensité énergétique de l'activité économique dans les pays industrialisés:Les évolutions de très longue période livrent-elles des renseignements utiles? Économies et sociétés (4) Avril.
27. Maurer, C., and Bhandari, R., 2000. The Climate of Export Credit Agencies., WRI Climate Notes Washington DC:World Resource Institute.
28. Moomaw, W., and Moreira, J., 2001. “ Technological and economic potential of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. ”. In Climate Change 2001:Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by:Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., and Pan, J., Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Ch. 3
29. Pacala, S., and Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization wedges:solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305:968–972.
30. Philibert, C., 2000. How could emissions trading benefit developing countries?. Energy Policy, 28:947–956.
31. Philibert, C., 2003. Technology, innovation, development and diffusion. OECD/IEA Information Paper. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2003)4.
32. Philibert, C., 2004a. International technology cooperation and climate change mitigation. OECD/IEA Information Paper. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)1.
33. Philibert, C., 2004b. International technology collaboration case study:concentrating solar power technologies. OECD and IEA Information Paper. COM/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2004)8.
34. Philibert, C., 2005. “ Energy demand, energy technologies, and climate stabilisation ”. In Proceedings of the IPCC Expert Meeting on Industrial Technology Development, Transfer and Diffusion, held in Tokyo, 21–23 September 2004
35. Philibert, C., and Pershing, J., 2001. Considering the options:climate targets for all countries. Climate Policy, 1:211–227.
36. Philibert, C., and Podkanski, J., 2005. International technology collaboration case study:clean coal technologies. OECD/IEA Information Paper. Com/ENV/EPOC/IEA/SLT(2005)4.
37. Philibert, C., and Reinaud, J., 2004. Emissions trading:taking stock and looking forward. OECD and IEA Information Paper Paris
38. Samaniego, J., and Figueres, C., 2002. “ Evolving to a sector-based clean development mechanism. ”. In Options for Protecting the Climate. Edited by:Baumert, K., Washington, DC:World Resource Institute.
39. Sharma, A., 2000. “ Whose carbon hypocrisy? Should Northern groups be pushing international financial institutions to stop funding fossil fuels projects in the South? ”. Down to Earth19(10), October 15 [see http://www.downtoearth.org.in/more_stories.asp?currentpage=85&news_id=20788]
40. Sussman, F., 2003. Harnessing financial flows from export credit agencies for climate protection. Prepared for the expert dialogue meeting on Future International Actions to Address Global Climate, October 20–23 Korea:Jeju Island.
41. Tebar Less, C., 2003. Overview of work on the transfer of environmentally friendly technologies. COM/ENV/TD(2003)32 Paris:OECD.