The bizarreness effect: Dissociation between item and source memory

Memory

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 682-689

  Macklin, Christopher B ^a   McDaniel, Mark A ^b  

^a OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPATIAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 27744574863     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210444000304     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., & McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory and Cognition, 22, 40-54.
2. Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
3. Brown, A. S., Jones, E. M., & Davis, T. L. (1995). Age differences in conversational source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 10, 111-122.
4. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002). A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 24, 403-416.
6. Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 416-429.
7. Ecker, W., & Engelkamp, J. (1995). Memory for actions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 349-371.
8. Eich, E, (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 764-770.
9. Ellis, N. R. (1990). Is memory for spatial location automatically encoded? Memory and Cognition, 18, 584-592.
10. Engelkamp, J. (1991). Memory of action events: Some implications for memory theory and imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Imagery and cognition (pp. 183-219). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Glisky, E. L., Polster, M. R., & Routhieaux, B. C. (1995). Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology, 9, 229-23.
12. Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1131-1146.
13. Hintzman, P. L., Block, R. A., & Summers, T. (1973). Contextual associations and memory for serial position. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 220-229.
14. Hirshman, E., Whelley, M. M., & Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 594-609.
15. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, P. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
16. Jurica, P. J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648-656.
17. Knoedler, A. J., Hellwig, K. A., & Neath, I. (1999). The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 474-487.
18. Koehler, S., Moscovitch, M., & Melo, B. (2001). Episodic memory for object location versus episodic memory for object identity: Do they rely on distinct encoding processes? Memory & Cognition, 29, 948-959.
19. McDaniel, M. A., DeLosh, E. L., & Merritt, P. S. (2000). Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: Recall of common versus bizarre material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1045-1056.
20. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 54-65.
21. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C. P., & Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422-435.
22. McIntyre, J. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175-192.
23. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 595-605.
24. Pra Baldi, A., de Beni, R., Cornoldi, C., & Cavedon, A. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 427-436.
25. Radvansky, G. A., & Potter, J. K. (2000). Source cuing: Memory for melodies. Memory & Cognition, 28, 693-699.
26. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
27. Tekman, H. G. (2001, November). Item and source memory in conceptual and perceptual tests. Paper presented at the 42nd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
28. Underwood, B. J., & Malmi, R. A. (1978). An evaluation of measures used in studying temporal codes for words within a list. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 278-293.
29. Winograd, E. (1968). List differentiation, recall, and category similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 510-515.