The Advisory Working Alliance Inventory - Advisor Version: Scale development and validation

Journal of Counseling Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 650-654

  Schlosser, Lewis Z ^a,b   Gelso, Charles J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advising relationships; Faculty student relationships; Psychology graduate training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVISORY WORKING ALLIANCE INVENTORY ADVISOR VERSION; ARTICLE; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 27744563765     PISSN: 00220167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.650     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 27-34.
2. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329.
4. Gelso, C. J. (1979). Research in counseling: Methodological and professional issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 7-35.
5. Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
6. Gelso, C. J., & Lent, R. W. (2000). Scientific training and scholarly productivity: The person, the training environment, and their interaction. In S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 109-139). New York: Wiley.
7. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
8. Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560.
9. Knox, S., Schlosser, L. Z., Pruitt, N., & Hill, C. E. (in press). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisor perspective. The Counseling Psychologist.
10. Leong, F. T. L., & Zachar, P. (1993). Presenting two brief versions of the Scientist Practitioner Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 162-170.
11. O'Brien, K. M., Malone, M. E., Schmidt, C. K., & Lucas, M. S. (1998, August). Research self-efficacy: Improvements in instrumentation. Poster presented at the 106th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
12. Ragins, B. R., & Scandura, T. A. (1999). Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 493-509.
13. Royalty, G. M., Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Garett, K. (1986). The environment and the student in counseling psychology: Does the research training environment influence graduate students' attitudes towards research? The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 9-30.
14. Schlosser, L. Z., & Gelso, C. J. (2001). Measuring the working alliance in advisor-advisee relationships in graduate school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 157-167.
15. Schlosser, L. Z., Knox, S., Moskovitz, A. M., & Hill, C. E. (2003). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 178-188.
16. Stiles, W. B., Gordon, L. E., & Lani, J. A. (2002). Session evaluation and the Session Evaluation Questionnaire. In G. S. Tryon (Ed.), Counseling based on process research: Applying what we know. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Stiles, W. B., & Snow, J. S. (1984). Counseling session impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 3-12.