Dual use and the "moral taint" problem

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 52-53

  Moreno, Jonathan David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Department of Biomedical Ethics ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ETHICS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MORALITY; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NOTE; POLICY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MORALS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 27744555930     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590961013     Document Type: Note

References (1)

1. Wolpe, P. R., K. R. Foster, and D. D. Langleben. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises or perils? The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 39-49.