Expert opinions in environmental litigation: Gatekeeping twelve years after Daubert

Environmental Forensics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 219-229

  Ries, David G ^a   Burns, Robert L ^b  

^a LLP   (United States)

^b PC   (United States)

Author keywords

Daubert; Environmental litigation; Expert opinions; Federal Rules of Evidence; Frye

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744547761     PISSN: 15275922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15275920500194340     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Bernstein, D. E., and Jackson, J. D. 2004. The Daubert Trilogy in the States, 44 Jurimetrics Spring: 351.
2. Cwik, C. H., and North, J. L. 1999. Scientific Evidence Review, Monograph No. 4 (American Bar Ass'n).
3. Cwik, C. H., and North, J. L. 2003. Scientific Evidence Review - Admissibility of Scientific Evidence in the Courtroom, Monograph No. 6 (American Bar Association).
4. Dixon, L., and Gill, B. 2002. Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision. Santa-Monica, CA: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.
5. Federal Judicial Center. 2000. Reference manual on scientific evidence (2nd. ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
6. Johnson, M. T., Krafka, C., and Cecil, J. S. 2000. Expert testimony in federal civil trials: A preliminary analysis "Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center. Available at www.fjc.gov, under Publications."
7. Krafka, C., Dunn, M., Johnson, M. T., Cecil, J. S., and Miletich, D. 2002. Judge and attorney experiences, practices and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center. Available at www.fjc.gov, under "Publications."