Emancipatory research methodology and disability: A critique

International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 281-296

  Danieli, Ardha ^a   Woodhams, Carol ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744543506     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1364557042000232853     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abberley, P. (1992). Counting us out: A discussion of the OPCS disability surveys. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 139-155.
2. Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1991). Objectivity and truth, problems of doing feminist research. In M. M. Fonow & J. A. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 133-153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3. Barnes, C. (1992). Qualitative research: Valuable or irrelevant? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 115-124.
4. Barnes, C. (1996). Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability and Society, 11(1), 107-110.
5. Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing 'emancipatory' disability research. Disability and Society, 18(1), 3-17.
6. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (1997). Breaking the mould? An introduction to doing disability research. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 1-14). Leeds: Disability Press.
7. Barnes, C., & Oliver, M. (1995). Disability rights: Rhetoric and reality in the UK. Disability and Society, 10, 111-116.
8. Barton, L. (1996). Sociology and disability: Some emerging issues. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 3-17). Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Becker, H. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239-247.
10. Bennett, U. (2002). Disabled by design. Disability and Society, 17, 809-823.
11. Booth, T. & Booth, W. (1996). Sounds of silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability and Society, 11(1), 55-70.
12. Booth, T. & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 18(4), 431-442.
13. Branfield, F. (1998). What are you doing here? 'Non-disabled' people and the disability movement: A response to Robert F Drake. Disability and Society, 13, 145-155.
14. Brown, S. C. (2001). Methodological paradigms that shape disability research. In G. L. Albrecht, K. Seeleman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 145-170). London: Sage.
15. Bury, M. (1996). Disability and the myth and the independent researcher: A reply. Disability and Society, 11, 111-113.
16. Cotterill, P. (1992). Interviewing women: Issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 593-606.
17. Cunningham, I., & James, P. (2001). Managing diversity and disability legislation: Catalysts for eradicating discrimination in the workplace? In M. Noon & E. Ogbonna (Eds.), Equality, diversity and disadvantage in employment (pp. 103-117). New York: Palgrave.
18. David, M. (2002). Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(1), 11-17.
19. Drake, R. F. (1997). What am I doing here? 'Non-disabled' people and the disability movement. Disability and Society, 12(4), 643-645.
20. Duckett, P. S. (1998). What are you doing here? 'Non disabled' people and the disability movement: A response to Fran Branfield. Disability and Society, 14, 625-628.
21. Duelli Klein, R. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 88-104). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22. Egharevba, I. (2001). Researching an-'other' minority ethnic community: Reflections of a black female researcher on the intersections of race, gender and other power positions on the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 225-241.
23. Felske, A. W. (1994). Knowing about knowing: Margin notes on disability research. In M. Rioux & M. Bach (Eds.), Disability is not measles (pp. 181-199). Ontario: L'Institue Roeher.
24. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. A. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25. Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Sellman, G. L. (1978). Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton.
26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
27. Goode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods in social research. New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
29. Humphrey, J. C. (2000). Researching disability politics, or, some problems with the social model in practice. Disability and Society, 15, 63-85.
30. Kitchen, R. (2000). The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society, 15, 25-47.
31. Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 569-581.
32. Martin, J., & White, A. (1988). The financial circumstances of disabled adults living in private households (OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain, Report 2). London: HMSO.
33. Martin, J., Meltzer, H., & Elliot, D. (1988). The prevalence of disability amongst adults (OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain, Report 1). London: HMSO.
34. Martin, J., White, A., & Meltzer, H. (1989). Disabled adults: Services, transport and employment (OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain, Report 4). London: HMSO.
35. Mercer, G. (2002). Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36. Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 117-140). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
37. Moore, M., Beazley, S., & Maelzer, J. (1997). Researching disability issues. Buckingham: Open University Press.
38. Morrell, J. (1990). The employment of people with disabilities: Research in to the policies and practices of employers (Research Paper No. 77). London: Employment Department.
39. Moser, C. A. (1958). Survey methods in social investigation. London: Heinemann.
40. Nielsen, J. M. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist research methods, exemplary readings in the social sciences. London: Westview Press.
41. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 101-115.
42. Oliver, M. (1993). Re-defining disability: A challenge to research. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers-Enabling environments (pp. 61-67). London: Sage.
43. Oliver, M. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18-42). London: Longman.
44. Oliver, M. (1997). Emancipatory research: Realistic goal or impossible dream? In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 15-31). Lees: Disability Press.
45. Priestley, M. (1997). Who's research?: A personal audit. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 88-107). Leeds: Disability Press.
46. Reinharz, S. (1983). Experiential analysis: A contribution to feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 162-191). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Rioux, M., & Bach, M. (Eds.). (1994). Disability is not measles. Ontario: L'Institue Roeher.
48. Roberts, H. (Ed.). (1981). Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
49. Sample, P. L. (1996). Beginnings: Participatory action research and adults with developmental disabilities. Disability and Society, 11, 317-332.
50. Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., & Cook, S. W. (1965). Research methods in social relations. London: Methuen.
51. Shakespeare, T. (1996). Rules of engagement: Doing disability research. Disability and Society, 11, 115-119.
52. Shakespeare, T. (1997). Researching disabled sexuality. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 177-189). Leeds: Disability Press.
53. Shields, V. R., & Dervin, B. (1993). Sense-making in feminist social science research: A call to enlarge the methodological options of feminist studies. Women's Studies International Forum, 16, 65-81.
54. Sjoberg, G., & Nett, R. (1968). A methodology for social research. New York: Harper and Row.
55. Smith, B., Poval, M., & Floyd, M. (1991). Managing disability at work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
56. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
57. Stasz Stoll, C. (1974). Female and male: Socialization, social roles and social structure. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C Brown.
58. Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 699-716.
59. Stuart, O. (1992a). Race and disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 177-188.
60. Stuart, O. (1992b). Race and disability: Just a double oppression? Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(3), 249-268.
61. Ward, L. (1997). Funding for change: Translating emancipatory disability research from theory to practice. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 33-48). Leeds: Disability Press.
62. Wendell, S. (1997). Towards a feminist theory of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 260-278). New York & London: Routledge.
63. Woodhams, C. (2003). Employing disabled workers: An investigation into organisational disability policies and practices. Retrieved from www.business.mmu.ac.uk/research/hrm/managingdiversity/2003disabilitysurvey.pdf
64. Woodhams, C., & Danieli, A. (2000). Disability and diversity-A difference too far? Personnel Review, 29, 402-416.
65. Woodhams, C., & Danieli, A. (2003). Operating diversity on the basis of disability. In M. J. Davidson & S. L. Fielden (Eds.), Individual diversity in organisations. Chichester: Wiley.
66. Zarb, G. (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps toward changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 125-139.
67. Zarb, G. (1997). Researching disabling barriers. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 49-66). Leeds: Disability Press.