THE FOX AND THE HEDGEHOG: MYOPIA ABOUT HOMELAND SECURITY IN U.S. POLICIES ON TERRORISM 1 Based on the author's presentation, "Backing into vulnerability: Homeland security in the wake of 9/11," Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, New Orleans, March 5-9, 2003.1

Research in Social Problems and Public Policy

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages 53-72

  Mitchell, James K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744541731     PISSN: 01961152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-1152(03)11005-8     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. E.L Anderson Assessing the risks of terrorism: A special collection of articles by former presidents of the Society for Risk Analysis Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 401 402
2. Armstrong, M. J. (2002). Urban hazard-mitigation: Increasing human security through re-assessing the steps toward livable communities . Fairfax, VA: ICF Consulting. http://www.icfconsulting.com/Publications/doc_files/Urban_Hazard_Mitigation.pdf
3. Berlin, S. I. (1951). Leo Tolstoy’s Historical Scepticism. Oxford Slavonic Papers , 2 , 17–54; reprinted with additions as The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy’s View of History (London, 1953: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).
4. Blaikie, P. et al. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters . London: Routledge.
5. C Chess J Calia Letter to the editor Risk Analysis 22 6 2002 1039 1040
6. Cutter, S. L. et al. (2001). American hazardscapes: The regionalization of hazards and disasters . Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
7. Cutter, S. L., Richardson, D., & Wilbanks, T. J. (Eds) (2003). The geographical dimensions of terrorism . New York: Routledge.
8. P.F Desiler Jr. A perspective: Risk analysis as a tool for reducing the risks of terrorism Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 405 413
9. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory . London: Routledge.
10. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers . Berkeley: University Press of California Press.
11. Enarson, E., & Morrow, B. H. (Eds) (1998). The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes . Westport, CT: Praeger.
12. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1995). Report of FEMAs Mitigation Directorate for Fiscal Year 1995 . Washington, DC.
13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003). Hazard mitigation: Its not just for natural disasters anymore . Washington, DC. http://www.fema.gov/fima/antiterrorism/
14. A Fothergill E.G.M Maestas J.D Darlington Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature Disasters 25 2 1999, June 156 173
15. Godschalk, D. R., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D. J., Kaiser, E. J., Bohl, C. C., & Goebel, R. M. (Eds) (1999). Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning . Washington, DC: Island Press.
16. GovExec.com (2002). (on-line magazine), http://www.govexec.com/features/1102/1102s2.htm
17. C.N Haas The role of risk analysis in understanding bioterrorism Risk Analysis 22 4 2002 671 677
18. Y.Y Haimes T Longstaff The role of risk analysis in the protection of critical infrastructures against terrorism Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 439 444
19. Harvard School of Public Health (2003). Promoting human security as a national security objective, http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hpcr/
20. G.F Heiken Modeling cities: The Los Alamos urban security initiative Public Works Management and Policy 4 3 2000 198 212
21. Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk . Harlow: Longman.
22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1997). The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability. In: R. T. Watson, M. C. Zinyowera & R. H. Moss (Eds), A Special Report of IPCC Working Group II . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptations, and vulnerability . Contributions of Working Group II to the Third Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2003). Environment and security . Winnipeg. http://www.iisd.org/natres/security/
25. Kasperson, J. X., & Kasperson, R. E. (Eds) (2001a). International workshop on vulnerability and global environmental change: A workshop summary . Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute. http://www.sei.se/risk/workshop.html
26. Kasperson, R. E., & Kasperson, J. X. (Eds) (2001b). Global environmental risk . Tokyo, New York, Paris and London: United Nations University Press and Earthscan. pp. 10–11.
27. H Kunreuther The role of insurance in managing extreme events: Implications for terrorism coverage Risk Analysis 22 3 2003 427 437
28. H Kunreuther Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world Risk Analysis 22 4 2003 655 664
29. L Lave Viewpoint: Risk analysis and the terrorism problem in two parts Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 403
30. Mileti, D. S. (Ed.) (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States . Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
31. Mitchell, J. K. (2002). Building research capacity to address terrorism. Countering terrorism: Lessons learned from natural and technological disasters . National Research Council, Washington, DC, February 28–March 1. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ndr/mitchell_abstract.html and http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ndr/Mitchell_Presentation.pdf
32. Mitchell, J. K. (2003a). Urban vulnerability to terrorism as hazard. In: S. L. Cutter, D. Richardson & T. J. Wilbanks (Eds), The Geographical Dimensions of Terrorism (pp. 17–25). New York: Routledge.
33. Mitchell, J. K. (2003b). Urban disasters as indicators of global environmental change: Assessing functional varieties of urban vulnerability, Earth system science in the anthropocene . Berlin: Springer-Verlag (forthcoming).
34. Moller, B. (1993). Security concepts: New challenges and risks, Working Paper 18. Copenhagen: Centre for Peace and Conflict Research.
35. National Research Council, Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism (2002). Making the nation safer: The role of science and technology in countering terrorism . Washington, DC.
36. National Research Council. Natural Disasters Roundtable (NDR) (2002). Countering terrorism: Lessons learned from natural and technological disasters , http://bob.nap.edu/books/NI000412/html/
37. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000). State of the art review of environment, security and development cooperation . Paris.
38. E Pate-Cornell Fusion of intelligence information: A Bayesian approach Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 445 454
39. Pew Research Center (2002). What the world thinks in 2002: How global publics view – their lives, their countries, the world, America . Washington, DC. Report 1652. pdf.
40. Platt, R. H. et al. (1999). Disaster and democracy and disasters: The politics of extreme natural events . Washington, DC: Island Press.
41. Popkin, R. (1990). The history and politics of disaster management in the United States. In: A. Kirby (Ed.), Nothing to Fear: Risks and Hazards in American Society (pp. 101–130). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
42. R Schwing A mental model proposed to address sustainability and terrorism issues Risk Analysis 22 3 2003 415 420
43. P Slovic Terrorism as hazard: A new species of trouble Risk Analysis 22 3 2002 425 426
44. Wisner, B. (2002). Is there a geographical theory of terror? Panel Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Los Angeles, 19–24 March, 2002. http://www.anglia.ac.uk/geography/radix/resources/geographica-theory-of-terror-2002.doc
45. Witt, J. L., & Morgan, J. (2002). Stronger in the broken places: Nine lessons for turning crisis into triumph . New York: Times Books.