Bibliometric methods: Pitfalls and possibilities

Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 261-275

  Wallin, Johan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; SHORT SURVEY; SKILL; STANDARDIZATION;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; MEDLINE; PERIODICALS; RESEARCH;

EID: 27744540342     PISSN: 17427835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (150)

1. Abt, H. A.: What fraction of literature references are incorrect. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1992, 104, 235-236.
2. Abt, H. A.: Do important papers produce high citation counts? Scientometrics 2000a, 48, 65-70.
3. Abt, H. A.: The reference-frequency relation in the physical sciences. Scientometrics 2000b, 49, 443-451.
4. Aksnes, D. W.: A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 2003, 56, 235-246.
5. Aksnes, D. W. & G. Sivertsen: The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics 2004, 59, 213-224.
6. Baldi, S.: Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. Amer. Social. Rev. 1998, 63, 829-846.
7. Billesbølle, P., P. J. Hindhede Blyme & O. Glerup: Citeringsfrekvens i Ugeskrift for Læger - Hvilke tidsskrifter blev eiteret i 1986? Ugeskrift for Læger 1988, 150, 2650-2652.
8. Bonitz, M. & A. Scharnhorst: Competition in science and the Matthew core journals. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 37-54.
9. Bordons, M., M. T. Fernandez & I. Gomez: Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 195-206.
10. Bornstein, R. F.: The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue. Behav. Brain Sci. 1991, 14, 138.
11. Bourke, P. & L. Butler: Publication types, citation rates and evaluation. Scientometrics 1996, 37, 473-494.
12. Broadus, R. N.: An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1983, 34, 132-135.
13. Brooks, T. A.: Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1985, 36, 223-229.
14. Brooks, T. A.: Evidence of complex citer motivations. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1986, 37, 34-36.
15. Cano, V.: Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1989, 40, 284-290.
16. Case, D. O. & G. M. Higgins: How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 2000, 51, 635-645.
17. Chew, F.S. & A. Relyea-Chew: How research becomes knowledge in radiology: An analysis of citations to published papers. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1988, 150, 31-37.
18. Council for Medical Sciences of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. The societal impact of applied health research. Towards a quality assessment system. ISBN 90-6984-360-9, 5-49. Amsterdam, KNAW Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2002.
19. Cronin, B.: Metatheorizing citation - Comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics 1998, 43, 45-55.
20. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics. J. Document. 2000, 56, 440-453.
21. Cronin, B. & D. Shaw: Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics 2002, 54, 31-49.
22. Cronin, B., H. Snyder & H. Atkins: Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. J. Document. 1997, 53, 263-273.
23. Dame, M. A. & F. D. Wolinsky: Rating journals in health care administration. The use of bibliometric measures. Med. Care 1993, 31, 520-524.
24. del Rio, J. A., R. N. Kostoff, E. O. Garcia, A. M. Ramirez & J. A. Humenik: Phemomenological approach to profile impact of scientific research: Citation mining. Advances in Complex Systems 2002, 5, 19-42.
25. Egghe, L., R. Rousseau & G. Van Hooydonk: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci, 2000, 51, 145-157.
26. Fano, R. M.: Information theory and the retrieval of recorded information. In: Documentation in action. Based on the Proceedings of the 1956 Western Reserve Conference "Documentation in Action". Eds.: J. H. Shera, A. Kent and J. W. Perry. Reinhold Publishing Corporation. Chapman & Hall Ltd., New York, London, 1956, pp. 238-244.
27. Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics: Is the tail now wagging the dog? Libri 1998, 48, 67-80.
28. Gilbert, G. N.: Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7, 113-122.
29. Gisvold, S. E.: Citation analysis and Journal Impact Factors - Is the tail wagging the dog? Acta anaesthesiol. Scand. 1999, 43, 971-973.
30. Glänzel, W.: The need for standards in bibliometric research and Technology. Scientometrics 1996, 35, 167-176.
31. Glänzel, W.: Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 511-522.
32. Glänzel, W. & H. J. Czerwon: A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics 1996, 37, 195-221.
33. Glänzel, W. & H. F. Moed: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 171-193.
34. Glänzel, W. & U. Schoepflin: A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. J. Inform. Sci. 1995, 21, 37-53.
35. Glänzel, W. & U. Schoepflin: A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management 1999, 35, 31-44.
36. Glänzel, W. & B. Thijs: World flash on basic research - the influence of author self-citations on bibliometric macro indicators. Scientometrics 2004, 59, 281-310.
37. Glänzel, W., B. Thijs & B. Schlemmer: A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics 2004, 59, 63-77.
38. Gmur, M.: Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics 2003, 57, 27-57.
39. Gupta, A. K., K. Nicol & A. Johnson: Pityriasis versicolor: Quality of studies. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2004, 15, 40-45.
40. Hall, J. C. & C. Platell: Half-life of truth in surgical literature. Lancet 1997, 350, 1752.
41. Harsanyi, M. A.: Multiple authors, multiple problems - Bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library & Information Science Research 1993, 15, 325-354.
42. Hecht, F., B. K. Hecht & A. A. Sandberg: The journal "Impact Factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1998, 104, 77-81.
43. Hicks, D.: Limitations of cocitation analysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science 1987, 17, 295-316.
44. Hood, W. W. & C. S. Wilson: Informetric studies using databases: opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics 2003, 58, 587-608.
45. Hwang, S. S., H. H. Song, J. H. Baik, S. L. Jung, S. H. Park, K. H. Choi & Y. H. Park: Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: Analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in Radiology. International Committee of Medical journal Editors. Radiology 2003, 226, 16-23.
46. Ingwersen, P., B. Larsen & I. Wormell: Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In: The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Eds.: B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins. Information Today & American Society for Information Science., Medford N.J., 2000, pp. 373-387.
47. Kessler, M. M.: Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Amer. Document. 1963, 14, 10-25.
48. Kim, K.: The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references. Scientometrics 2004, 59, 79-93.
49. King, D. A.: The scientific impact of nations. Nature 2004, 430, 311-316.
50. Kostoff, R. N.: The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation - Comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics 1998, 43, 27-43.
51. Kostoff, R. N.: Citation analysis of research performer quality. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 49-71.
52. Kostoff, R. N., J. A. del Rio, J. A. Humenik, E. O. Garcia & A. M. Ramirez: Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2001, 52, 1148-1156.
53. Lange, L. L.: Citation counts of multi-authored papers - First-named authors and further authors. Scientometrics 2001, 52, 457-470.
54. Larsen, B.: Journal Impact Factors i forskningsevaluering. En undersøgelse af sammenhængen mellem Journal Impact Factor og antal modtagne citationer. CIS Rapport 10, 1-23. København, Center for Informetriske Studier. Danmarks Biblioteksskole, 1999.
55. Lawani, S. M.: Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics 1986, 9, 13-25.
56. Lawani, S. M. & A. E. Bayer: Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1983, 34, 59-66.
57. Lawrence, P. A.: The politics of publication - Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research. Nature 2003, 422, 259-261.
58. Lee, J. D., K. J. Vicente, A. Cassano & A. Shearer: Can scientific impact be judged prospectively? A bibliometric test of Simonton's model of creative productivity. Scientometrics 2003, 56, 223-233.
59. Leopold, E., M. May & G. Paass: Data mining and text-mining for science & technology research. In: Handbook of quantitative science and technology transfer. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Eds.: H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel & U. Schmoch. Kluwer Acdaemic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2004, pp. 187-213.
60. Lewison, G.: Researchers' and users' perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 229-240.
61. Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citation? Scientometrics 1998, 43, 5-25.
62. MacKinnon, L. & M. Clarke: Citation of group-authored papers. Lancet 2002, 1513-1514.
63. MacRoberts, M. H. & B. R. MacRoberts: The negational reference: or the art of dissembling. Social Studies of Science 1984, 14, 91-94.
64. MacRoberts, M. H. & B. R. MacRoberts: Quantitative masures of communication in science: A study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science 1986, 16, 151-172.
65. MacRoberts, M. H. & B. R. MacRoberts: Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 435-444.
66. Maricic, S., J. Spaventi, L. Pavicic & G. Pifat-Mrzljak: Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1998, 49, 530-540.
67. McAllister, P. R., R. C. Anderson & F. Narin: Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1980, 31, 147-152.
68. McVeigh, M. E.: Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports - Science edition (2002): A citation study from the Thomson Corporation. The Thomson Corporation, 2004.
69. Meenen, N. M.: Der Impact-Faktor - Ein zuverlässiger scientometrischer Parameter? Unfallchirurgie 1997, 23, 128-134.
70. Meho, L. I. & D. H. Sonnenwald: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 2000, 51, 123-138.
71. Merton, R. K.: The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159, 56-63.
72. Meyer, M.: Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 2000a, 29, 409-434.
73. Meyer, M.: What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 2000b, 49, 93-123.
74. Michel, J. & B. Bettels: Patent citation analysis - A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 185-201.
75. Moed, H. F. The Impact-Factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits. Nature 2002, 415, 731-732.
76. Moed, H. F., W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort & A. F. J. van Raan: The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics 1985a, 8, 177-203.
77. Moed, H. F., W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort & A. F. J. van Raan: The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy 1985b, 14, 131-149.
78. Moed, H. F. & E. Garfield: In basic science the percentage of 'authoritative' references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 295-303.
79. Moed, H. F. & F. T. Hesselink: The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications. Research Policy 1996, 25, 819-836.
80. Moed, H. F. & T. N. Van Leeuwen: Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Impact Factors. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1995, 46, 461-467.
81. Moed, H. F. & M. Vriens: Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. J. Inform. Sci. 1989, 15, 95-107.
82. Moravcsik, M. J. & P. Murugesan: Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5, 86-92.
83. Murugesan, P. & M. J. Moravcsik: Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1978, 29, 141-147.
84. Narin, F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 1994, 30, 147-155.
85. Narin, F., A. Breitzman & P. Thomas: Using patent citation indicators to manage a stock portfolio. In: Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Eds.: H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmock. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2004, pp. 553-568.
86. Narin, F., M. P. Carpenter & P. Woolf: Technological performance assessments based on patents and patent citations. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management 1984, 31, 172-183.
87. Narin, F. & K. S. Hamilton: Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 293-310.
88. Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton & D. Olivastro: The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 1997, 26, 317-330.
89. Narin, F. & D. Olivastro: Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy 1992, 21, 237-249.
90. Narin, F., D. Olivastro & K. A. Stevens: Bibliometrics/Theory, practice and problems. Evaluation Review 1994, 18, 65-76.
91. Nederhof, A. J., M. Luwel & H. F. Moed: Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in linguistics: An alternative to citation-based Journal Impact Factors. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 241-265.
92. Nederhof, A. J. & A. F. J. van Raan: A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review. Research Policy 1993, 22, 353-368.
93. Nederhof, A. J. & R. A. Zwaan: Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences. J Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1991, 42, 332-340.
94. Nederhof, A. J., R. A. Zwaan, R. E. De Bruin & P. J. Dekker: Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: A comparative Study. Scientometrics 1989, 15, 423-435.
95. Nicolaisen, J.: The J-shaped distribution of citedness. J. Document. 2002, 58, 383-395.
96. Nisonger, T. E.: The Relationship between international editorial board composition and citation measures in political science, business, and genetics journals. Scientometrics 2002, 54, 257-268.
97. Oppenheim, C.: The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. J. Document. 1995, 51, 18-27.
98. Oppenheim, C.: The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology. J. Document. 1997, 53, 477-487.
99. Opthof, T.: Sense and nonsense about the Impact Factor. Cardiovasc. Res. 1997, 33, 1-7.
100. Opthof, T., R. Coronel & H. M. Piper: Impact Factors: No totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004, 61, 201-203.
101. Porta, M.: The bibliographic "Impact Factor" of the Institute for Scientific Information: How relevant is it really for public health journals? J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1996, 50, 606-610.
102. Poynard, T., M. Munteanu, V. Ratzlu, Y. Benhamou, V. Di Martino, J. Taieb & P. Opolon: Truth survival in clinical research: an evidence-based requiem? Ann. Int. Med. 2002, 136, 888-895.
103. Price, D. J. D.: A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1976, 27, 292-306.
104. Proceedings of the Workshop on "Bibliometric Standards". Satellite event to the 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informelrics. Rosary College, River Forest, Illinois (USA) Sunday, June 11, 1995. W. Glänzel, J. S. Katz & H. Moed. Scientometrics, Volume 35, Issue 2, 1996 , 166-290, 1996. Budapest, Akademiai Kiado.
105. Reedijk, J.: Sense and nonsense of Science Citation analyses: Comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data. New J. Chem. 1998, 22, 767-770.
106. Rinia, E. J., T. N. Van Leeuwen, E. E. W. Bruins, H. G. van Vuren & A. F. J. van Raan: Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 293-309.
107. Rinia, E. J., T. N., Van Leeuwen, H. G. van Vuren & A. F. J. van Raan: Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria - Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy 1998, 27, 95-107.
108. Rousseau, R. & G. Van Hooydonk: Journal production and journal Impact Factors. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1996, 47, 775-780.
109. Schubert, A. & T. Braun: Reference standards for citation based Assessments. Scientometrics 1993, 26, 21-35.
110. Schubert, A. & T. Braun: Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 311-324.
111. Seglen, P. O.: The skewness of science. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1992, 43, 628-638.
112. Seglen, P. O.: Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1994, 45, 1-11.
113. Seglen, P. O.: Why the Impact Factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Brit. Med. J. 1997, 314, 498-502.
114. Sen, S. K. & S. K. Gan: A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Ann. Library Sci. Documentation 1983, 30, 78-82.
115. Simkin, M. V. & V. P. Roychowdhury: Copied citations create renowned papers? Condensed Matter 0305150 (to appear in Annals of Improbable Research) 2003, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/10305150.
116. Simkin, M. V. & V. P. Roychowdhury: Stochastic modeling of citation slips. Scientometrics 2005, 62, 367-384.
117. Small, H.: Co-citation in the scientific literature - A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Current Contents 1974, 7-10.
118. Small, H.: A Co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7, 139-166.
119. Small, H.: On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 71-79.
120. Sombatsompop, N., T. Markpin & N. Premkamolnetr: A modified method for calculating the impact factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: Polymer science category in 1997-2001. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 217-235.
121. Stern, R. E.: Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1990, 41, 193-196.
122. Szava-Kovats, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal Literature of physics. I. A literature science study on the journal level. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2001, 52, 201-211.
123. Tijssen, R. J. W.: Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy 2001, 30, 35-54.
124. Todorov, R.: Displaying content of scientific journals - A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics 1992, 23, 319-334.
125. Todorov, R. & M. Winterhager: Mapping Australian geophysics - A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics 1990, 19, 35-56.
126. Trueba, F. J. & H. Guerrero: A robust formula to credit authors for their publications. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 181-204.
127. Tsay, M. Y. & S. S. Ma: The nature and relationship between the productivity of journals and their citations in semiconductor literature. Scientometrics 2003, 56, 201-222.
128. Van Hooydonk, G.: Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1997, 48, 944-945.
129. Van Hooydonk, G.: Standardizing relative impacts: Estimating the quality of research from citation counts. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1998, 49, 932-941.
130. Van Leeuwen, T. N. & Moed, H. F.: Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 249-266.
131. Van Leeuwen, T. N., H. F. Moed & J. Reedijk: Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information Impact Factors: A sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. J. Inform. Sci. 1999, 25, 489-498.
132. Van Leeuwen, T. N., M. S. Visser, H. F. Moed, T. J. Nederhof & A. F. J. van Raan: The holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics 2003, 57, 257-280.
133. van Raan, A. F. J.: Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 1996, 36, 397-420.
134. van Raan, A. F. J.: In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much - Comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics 1998a, 43, 129-139.
135. van Raan, A. F. J.: The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results - Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics 1998b, 42, 423-428.
136. van Raan A. F. J.: Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. In: Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Eds.: Moed, H. F., W. Glänzel & U. Schmock. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2004, pp. 19-50.
137. van Raan, A. F. J. & T. N. Van Leeuwen: Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research - Application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research. Research Policy 2002, 31, 611-632.
138. Vinkler, P.: Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals from different subfields. Scientometrics 1991, 20, 145-161.
139. Vinkler, P.: Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice. Scientometrics 2002, 53, 267-279.
140. Virgo, J. A.: A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers. Library Quarterly 1977, 47, 415-430.
141. Wallin, J. A.: Forskningen ved Sundhedsvidenskab i Odense 1966-1997. En bibliometrisk undersøgelse. Del Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet. Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark. 1999.
142. Wallin, J. A.: Forskningen ved Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet Syddansk Universitet 1998-2000. En bibliometrisk undersøgelse. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet. Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark, 2004.
143. West, R. & A. McIlwaine: What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality. Addiction 2002, 97, 501-504.
144. White, H. D.: Authors as citers over time. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 2001, 52, 87-108.
145. White, H. D.: Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal hoax: A study in citation identities. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 93-120.
146. White, M. D. & P. L. Wang: A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly 1997, 67, 122-154.
147. Whitehouse, G. H.: Impact Factors: facts and myths. Eur. Radiol. 2002, 12, 715-717.
148. Yue, W. P. & C. S. Wilson: Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: A structural equation modelling analysis. Scientometrics 2004, 60, 317-332.
149. Zetterström, R.: Bibliometric data: A disaster for many non-american biomedical journals. Acta Paediatrics 2002, 91, 1020-1024.
150. Zitt, M., S. Ramanana-Rahary & E. Bassecoulard: Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation. Scientometrics 2003, 56, 259-282.