Dynamic responsiveness in the U.S. Senate

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 299-312

  Fowler, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744531758     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00124.x     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. "Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate." Journal of Politics 60(3):634-52.
2. Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University.
3. Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, and C. Stewart. 2001a. "Candidate Positioning in US House Elections." American Journal of Political Science 45(l):136-59.
5. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, and C. Stewart. 2001b. "The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting." Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(4):533-72.
6. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7. Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Randall W. Partin. 1995. "Economic and Referendum Voting - A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections." American Political Science Review 89(1):99-107.
8. Bartels, Larry M. 1991. "Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making-The Reagan Defense Buildup." American Political Science Review 85(2):456-74.
9. Bartels, Larry M., and John Zaller. 2001. "Al Gore and George Bush's Not-So-Excellent Adventure-Presidential Vote Models: A Recount." PS-Political Science & Politics 34(1):8-20.
10. Calvert, Randall L. 1985. "Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model-Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence." American Journal of Political Science 29(1):69-95.
11. Conley, Patricia. 2001. Presidential Mandates: How Elections Shape the National Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago.
12. DiMaggio, Paul, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. "Have Americans' Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?" American Journal of Sociology 102(3):690-755.
13. Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
14. Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress, Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. "Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections-Microanalysis." American Journal of Political Science 22(2):426-43.
16. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1990. "Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias. " American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 1142-64.
17. Greenberg, Joseph, and Kenneth Shepsle. 1987. "The Effect of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with Entry." American Political Science Review 81(2):525-37.
18. Groseclose, Timothy, Steve D. Levitt, and James M. Snyder. 1999. "Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted Ada Scores for the U.S. Congress." American Political Science Review 93(1):33-50.
19. Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. "Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization. " American Political Science Review 95(3):619-31.
20. Iversen, Torben 1994. "The Logics of Electoral-Politics - Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects." Comparative Political Studies 27(2):155-89.
21. Jackson, John E., and David C. King. 1989. "Public-Goods, Private Interests, and Representation." American Political Science Review 83(4): 1143-64.
22. Jacobson, Gary C. 1991. The Persistence of Democratic House Majorities. In The Politics of Divided Government, ed. G. W. Cox and S. Kernell. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
23. Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1981. Strategy and Choke in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24. King, Anthony Stephen. 1997. Running Scared: Why America's Politicians Campaign Too Much and Govern Too Little. New York: Martin Kessler Books.
25. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. "Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation." American Journal of Political Science 44(2):347-61.
26. King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. "Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation." American Political Science Review 95(l):49-69.
27. Kramer, Gerald H. 1977. "Dynamical Model of Political Equilibrium." Journal of Economic Theory 16(2):310-34.
28. Layman, Geoffry C., and Tom M. Carsey. 2002. "Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate." American Journal of Political Science 46(4):786-802.
29. Macy, Michael W. 1995. "Pavlov and the Evolution of Cooperation: An Experimental Test." Social Psychological Quarterly 58: 74-87.
30. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale Studies in Political Science 26.
31. Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. "Constituency Influence in Congress." American Political Science Review 57: 45-56.
32. Morton, Rebecca B. 1993. "Incomplete Information and Ideological Explanations of Platform Divergence." American Political Science Review 87(2):382-92.
33. Osborne, Martin J. 1995. "Spatial Models of Political Competition under Plurality Rule - a Survey of Some Explanations of the Number of Candidates and the Positions They Take." Canadian Journal of Economics 28(2):261-301.
34. Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984. "Spatial Equilibrium with Entry." Review of Economic Studies 51(l):139-56.
36. Poole, Keith T. 1998. "Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales." American Journal of Political Science 42(3):954-93.
37. Poole, Keith T. 2003. Changing Minds? Not in Congress! University of Houston, cited April 15, 2003. Available from http://voteview.uh.edu/chminds.pdf.
38. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Roemer, John E. 2001. Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40. Smirnov, Oleg, and James Fowler. 2003. "Moving with the Mandate: Policy-Motivated Parties in Dynamic Political Competition." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
41. Stigler, George. 1972. "Economic Competition and Political Competition." Public Choke 13:91-106.
42. Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. "Dynamic Representation." American Political Science Review 89(3):543-65.
43. Stokes, Susan C. 1999. "Political Parties and Democracy." Annual Review of Political Science 2:243-67.
44. Stone, Walter J. 1980. "The Dynamics of Constituency - Electoral Control in the House." American Politics Quarterly 8(4):399-424.
45. Wittman, Donald 1977. "Candidates with Policy Preferences Dynamic-Model." Journal of Economic Theory 14(1):180-89.