A comparative evaluation of neural networks and hidden Markov models for monitoring turning tool wear

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 325-336

  Scheffer, C ^a   Engelbrecht, H ^a   Heyns, P S ^b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Condition monitoring; Hidden Markov models; Neural networks; Tool wear

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744526118     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-005-0469-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Teti R (1995) A review of tool condition monitoring literature database. Ann CIRP 44:659-667
2. Sick B (2002) Online and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with arti(fi)cial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Processing 16:487-546
3. Ertunc HM, Loparo KA (2001) A decision fusion algorithm for tool wear condition monitoring in drilling. Mech Syst Signal Processing 41:1347-1362
4. Ertunc HM, Loparo KA, Ocak H (2001) Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Mech Syst Signal Processing 41:1363-1384
5. Bunks C, McCarthy D, Al-Ani T (2000) Condition-based maintenance of machines using Hidden Markov Models. Mech Syst Signal Processing 14:597-612
6. Silva RG, Rueben RL, Baker KJ, Wilcox SJ (1998) Tool wear monitoring of turning operations by neural network and expert system classification of a feature set generated form multiple sensors. Mech Syst Signal Processing 12:319-332
7. Govekar E, Grabec I (1994) Self-organizing neural network application to drill wear classification. Trans ASME: J Eng Indust 116:233-238
8. Jiaa CL, Dornfeld DA (1998) A self-organizing approach to the prediction and detection of tool wear. ISA Trans 37:239-255
9. Dimla DE, Lister PM, Leighton NJ (1996) Investigation of a single-layer perceptron neural network to tool wear inception in a metal turning process. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEE colloquium on modelling and signal processing for fault diagnosis, pp 3/1-3/4
10. Lou K, Lin C (1997) An intelligent sensor fusion system for tool monitoring on a machining centre. Int J Adv Manufacturing Technol 13:556-565
11. Baum LE, Eagon JA (1967) An inequality with applications to statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of Markov processes and to a model for ecology. Bull Am Math Soc 73:360-363
12. Wu M, Wang DL, Brown GJ, A multi-pitch tracking algorithm for noisy speech, IEEE Trans, on Speech and Audio Processing 11:229-241
13. Rabiner LR (1989) A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 77(2):257-286
14. Rabiner LR, Juang BH (1986) An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Mag 1(3):4-16
15. Scheffer C, Heyns PS (2004) An industrial tool wear monitoring system for interrupted turning. Mech Syst Signal Processing 18:1219-1242
16. Scheffer C, Heyns PS (2002) A robust and cost-effective system for conducting cutting experiments in a production environment. In: Proceedings of 3rd CIRP international conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering (ICME 2002), Ischia, Italy, 3-5 July 2002, p 329-334
17. Jawahir IS, Li PX, Gosh R, Exner EL (1995) A new parametric approach for the assessment of comprehensive tool wear in coated grooved tools. Annals of the CIRP 44:49-54
18. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimisation, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol 4. Perth, Australia, pp 1942-1948
19. Scheffer C (2002) Development of a wear monitoring system for turning tools using artificial intelligence. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria
20. Bakis R (1976) Continuous speech word recognition via centisecond acoustic states, In: Proceedings of 91st meeting of the Acoustic Society of America (Washington, DC)
21. Levinson SE (1986) Continuously variable duration Hidden Markov model for automatic speech recognition. Comput Speech Lang 10:29-45
22. Russell MJ, Moore RK (1985) Explicit modelling of state occupancy in hidden Markov models for automatic speech recognition. In: Proceedings on international conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, Tampa, 26-29 March 1985, p 5-8