Constraining new forces in the casimir regime using the isoelectronic technique

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 24, 2005, Pages

  Decca, R S ^a   Lopez D ^b   Chan, H B ^c   Fischbach, E ^d   Krause, D E ^d,e   Jamell, C R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^c University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e WABASH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASIMIR REGIME; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL TORSIONAL OSCILLATORS; NEWTONIAN GRAVITY;

GOLD; GRAVITATION; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES;

FORCE MEASUREMENT;

EID: 27744518724     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.240401     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. R.S. Decca, Phys. Rev. D 68, 116003 (2003); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.116003
2. R.S. Decca Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 318, 87 (2005).
3. R.S. Decca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 050402 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.050402
4. E. Fischbach, Phys. Lett. A 318, 165 (2003); PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2003.07.010
5. J.C. Long, A.B. Churnside, and J.C. Price, in The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, edited by, V.G. Gurzadyan, R.T. Jantzen, and, R. Ruffini, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002).
6. M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V.M. Mostepanenko, Phys. Rep. 353, 1 (2001), and references therein. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00015-1
7. J.C. Long, H.W. Chan, and J.C. Price, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B539, 23 (1999). 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00711-1
8. S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5
9. S.K. Lamoreaux Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5475(E) (1998). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5475
10. U. Mohideen and A. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4549 (1998); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4549
11. G.L. Klimchitskaya, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 60, 3487 (1999); 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.3487
12. A. Roy and U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4380 (1999); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4380
13. B.W. Harris, F. Chen, and U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 62, 052109 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052109
14. J. Chiaverini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 151101 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.151101
15. G. Bressi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 041804 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.041804
16. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00466-3
17. N. Arkani-Hamed S. Dimopoulos G. Dvali Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086004
18. E.G. Adelberger, B.R. Heckel, and A.E. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. ARPSDF 0163-8998 53, 77 (2003). 10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110503
19. B. Abbott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1156 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1156
20. H.B.G. Casimir, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. PKNAAU 0370-0348 51, 793 (1948).
21. E. Fischbach, Classical Quantum Gravity CQGRDG 0264-9381 18, 2427 (2001); 10.1088/0264-9381/18/13/305
22. D.E. Krause and E. Fischbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 190406 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.190406
23. R. Matloob and H. Falinejad, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 64, 042102 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.042102
24. Differences between the model used in this Letter and more sophisticated calculations agree to within 2%, adequate for our order of magnitude estimate.
25. F. Chen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 69, 022117 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022117
26. S. Dimopoulos and A.A. Geraci, Phys. Rev. D 68, 124021 (2003). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.124021
27. Removing the constraints imposed on the undetermined constants (λ(0)/λ(1))×(M/5×1017GeV) and (λg-1)×(M/ 5×1017GeV) yields the limits on moduli.