Introducing disability studies to occupational therapy students

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 554-560

  Block, Pamela ^a   Ricafrente Biazon, Melissa ^b   Russo, Ann ^c   Ke, Yun Chu ^d   Sud, Suman ^e   Koerner, Lori ^f   Vittoria, Karen ^g   Landgrover, Alyssa ^h   Olowu, Tosin ^g  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Jack D Weiler Hospital   (United States)

^c UCP Nassau County   (United States)

^d Elmhurst Hospital   (United States)

^e Central Island Healthcare   (United States)

^f Just Kids Diagnostic and Treatment Center   (United States)

^g New Interdisciplinary School ^*

^h New Interdisciplinary School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744512169     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.59.5.554     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2004). Consumer information: What is occupational therapy? Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.aota.org/ featured/area6/index.asp
2. Asch, A., & Fine M. (1997). Nurturance, sexuality and women with disabilities. In L. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies reader (pp. 241-255). New York: Routledge.
3. Balcazar, F., Taylor, R., Kielhofner, G., Tamley, K., Benziger, T., Carlin, N., et al. (2004). Participatory action research: General principles and a study with a chronic health condition. In L. Jason, C. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. Taylor, M. Davis, J. Durlak, et al. (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Block, P. (1997). Biology, culture, and cognitive disability: Twentieth century professional discourse in Brazil and the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University. (UMI No. 9727344)
5. Block, P. (2000). Sexuality, fertility and danger: Twentieth century images of women with cognitive disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 18(4), 239-254.
6. Block, P. (2002). Sexuality, parenthood, and cognitive disability in Brazil. Sexuality and Disability, 20(1): 7-28.
7. Block, P. (2004). Disability studies in the belly of the beast [Electronic version]. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(4).
8. Block, P., Balcazar, F., & Keys, C. (2001). From pathology to power: Rethinking race, poverty and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(1), 18-27.
9. Block, P., Balcazar, F., & Keys, C. (2002). Race, poverty and disability: Three strikes and you're out! Or are you? Social Policy, 33(1), 34-38.
10. Block, P., Skeels, S. E., Keys, C. B., & Rimmer, J. (2005). Shake-it-up: Health promotion and capacity building for people with spinal cord injuries and related neurological disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(4), 185-190.
11. Blumberg, L. (1989, March/April). The revolt of the Easter Seal Kids. Disability Rag. 9(2).
12. Callahan, J. (1989). Don't worry he won't get far on foot. New York: Vintage.
13. De Heer, R., Pedersoli, G., & Procacci, D. (Producers), & de Heer, R. (Director). (1997). Dance me to my song [Videotape]. Hendon, South Australia, Australia: Vertigo Productions. (Available from www. vertigoproductions.com.au/dance.html)
14. Dybwad, G. (1986). Ethical and legal problems in rehabilitation medicine. In D. Warms (Ed.), The changing rehabilitation world: Into the 21st century: Selected papers from an international conference, September 3-4, 1985 (pp. 10-15). New York: United Cerebral Palsy.
15. Ervin, M. (1997). Coitus interruptus. In K. Fries (Ed.), Staring back (pp. 239-254). New York: Plume Books.
16. Gill, C. J. (2001). Divided understandings: The social experience of disability. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disabilities studies (pp. 351-372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeblemindedness. New York: MacMillan.
18. Johnson, H. M. (2003, November 23). The disability gulag. NYT: Magazine desk, p. 59
19. Kielhofner, G. (2004). Disability studies. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 238-253). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
20. Kielhofner, G. (2005). Rethinking disability and what to do about it: Disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 487-496.
21. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
22. Lefkowitz, B. (1997). Our Guys. New York: Vintage Books.
23. Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors. New York: Basic.
24. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
25. Park, P., Brydon-Miller, M., Hall, B., & Jackson, T. (1993). Voices of change: Participatory action research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
26. Rivera, G. (1972). Willowbrook. New York: Random House.
27. Society for Disability Studies. (2004). General information: Mission statement. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.uic.edu/orgs/sds/ generalinfo.html
28. Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Trent, J. W. (1994). Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30. Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.