A structural model of the substance use pathways among minority youth

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 531-541

  Min, Qi Wang ^a   Matthew, Resa F ^b   Bellamy, Nikki ^c   James, Syretta ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b McFarland Institute   (United States)

^c SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Family protective factors; Social ecological model; Substance use

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744508580     PISSN: 10873244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.29.6.8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Harwood H. Updating estimates of the economic costs of alcohol abuse in the United States: estimates, update methods and data. Report prepared by the Lewin Group for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2000:1-8. Available at: http://www.niaaa.nih.gov. Accessed on September 5, 2004.
2. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/datareq.htm. Accessed on September 5, 2004.
3. Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R, Whiteside HO. Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38(11/13):1759-1787.
4. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). The National Cross-Site Evaluation of High-Risk Youth Programs. Monograph Series 1 prepared for CSAP by EMT Associates, Inc. and ORC Macro, DHHS Publication No. (SMA)00-3375, Rockville, MD 2002:1-23.
5. Ary DV, Duncan TE, Biglan A, et al. Development of adolescent problem behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999;27(2):141-150.
6. Spoth RL, Redmond C, Trudeau L, et al. Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002;16(2):129-134.
7. Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R. Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologists. 2003;58(6/7):457-465.
8. Bentler PM. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc. 1995:13-39.
9. Joreskog KG. Testing structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1993:294-316.
10. Spoth RL, Redmond C, Shin C. Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: extending a public health-oriented research base. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(2):385-399.
11. Sale E, Sambrano S, Springer JF, et al. Risk, protection, and substance use in adolescents: a multi-site model. J Drug Educ. 2003;33(1):91-105.
12. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). The National Cross-Site Evaluation of High-Risk Youth Programs. Final Report; prepared for CSAP by EMT Associates, Inc. and ORC Macro, 2000;4.18-4.22.
13. Dembo R, Wothke W, Shemwell M, et al. A structural model of the influence of family problems and child abuse factors on serious delinquency among youths processed at a juvenile assessment center. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse. 2000;10:17-31.
14. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979:1-348.
15. Gardiner HW, Mutter JD, Kosmitzki C. Lives Across Culture: Cross Cultural Human Development. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1998:1-330.
16. Dunst CJ, Jenkins V, Trivette CM. Family Support Scale: reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family, and Community Wellness. 1984;1(4):45-52.
17. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). CSAP National Youth Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996:1. Available at: http://www.emt.org/CSAP_NationalYouthSurvey.htm. Accessed on September 5, 2004.
18. Gresham FM, Elliott SN. The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services, 1990:1. Available at: HYPERLINK "http://www.agsnet.com/group. asp?nGroupInfoID=a3400" http://ww.agsnet.com/group.asp? GroupInfoID= 3400. Accessed September 5, 2004.
19. SAS. The SAS System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 1994.
20. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:411-423.
21. Bollen KA, Long JS. Introduction. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equations Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993:1-9.
22. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993:136-162.
23. Hatcher L. A step-by step approach to using the SAS System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 1994.
24. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley. 1989:319-331.
25. Kumpfer KL. How to get hard-to-reach parents involved in parenting programs. In: Pines D, Crute D, Rogers E, editors. Preventing Alcohol and Other Drug Use Problems in the Family. Rockville, MD: Office of Substance Abuse Prevention Monograph, 1991:87-95.
26. Bry BH, Catalano RF, Kumpfer KL, et al. Scientific findings from family prevention intervention research. In: Ashery RS, Robertson, Kumpfer KL, editors. Family Focused Prevention of Drug Abuse: Research and Interventions. NIDA Research Monograph. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, 1998:103-129.
27. Rutter M. Connections between child and adult psychopathology. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;5:4-7.
28. Moss HB, Kirisci L, Gordon H, et al. A neuropsychologic profile of adolescent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994;18:159-163.
29. Tarter RE, Mezzich AC, Hsieh YC, et al. Cognitive capacity in female adolescent substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;39:15-21.
30. Sanitistiban DA, Muir-Malcolm JA, Mitrani VB, et al. Integrating the study of ethic culture and family psychology intervention science. In: Liddle H, editor. Family Psychology: Science-Based Interventions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychology Association Press, 2001:331-351.