Visual representations of the 2004 presidential campaign: Political cartoons and popular culture references

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 479-487

  Conners, Joan L ^a  

^a RANDOLPH MACON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Elections; Mass media; Political cartoon; Popular culture

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744502457     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764205280920     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Bormann, E. G., Koester, J., & Bennett, J. (1978). Political cartoons and salient rhetorical fantasies: An empirical analysis of the '76 presidential campaign. Communication Monographs, 45, 317-329.
2. Buell, E. H., Jr., & Maus, M. (1988). Is the pen mightier than the word? Editorial cartoons and 1988 presidential nominating politics. P.S.: Political Science and Politics, 21(3), 847-858.
3. Conners, J. L. (1998). Hussein as enemy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(3) 96-115.
4. DeSousa, M. A., & Medhurst, M. J. (1982). Political cartoons and American culture: Significant symbols of campaign 1980. Studies in Visual Communication, 8, 84-97.
5. Edwards, J. L. (1997). Political cartoons in the 1988 presidential campaign: Image, metaphor, and narrative. New York: Garland.
6. Edwards, J. L. (2001). Running in the shadows in campaign 2000: Candidate metaphors in editorial cartoons. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2140-2151.
7. Hill, A. (1984). The Carter campaign in retrospect: Decoding the cartoons. In M. J. Medhurst & T. W. Benson (Eds.), Rhetorical dimensions in media: A critical casebook (pp. 182-203). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
8. Koetzle, W., & Brunell, T. L. (1996). Lip-reading, draft-dodging, and Perot-noia: Presidential campaigns in editorial cartoons. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(4), 94-115.
9. Kurtz, H. (2004, October 23). The campaign of a comedian: Jon Stewart's fake journalism enjoys real political impact. Washington Post, p. A01.
10. Lamb, C. (1996, Fall). Inky outlook. AAEC Notebook, p. 19.
11. Lamb, C., & Burns, J. (1996, March). What's wrong with this picture? The anti-incumbent bias of cartoons during the '92 campaign. Paper presented to the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Southeast Colloquium, Roanoke, VA.
12. Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A. (1981). Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197-236.
13. Morris, R. (1993). Visual rhetoric in political cartoons: A structuralist approach. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8, 195-210.
14. Sewell, E. H., Jr. (1998). "Torture-by-Tedium" or editorial cartoons during the 1996 presidential campaign. In R. E. Denton Jr. (Ed.). The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 161-177). Westport, CT: Praeger.