|
Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1406-1409
|
A comparison of two primary care trials on tennis elbow: Issues of external validity
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CORTICOSTEROID;
NAPROXEN;
NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;
PLACEBO;
GLUCOCORTICOID;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
COMORBIDITY;
CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY;
DISEASE COURSE;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
ELBOW;
ELBOW DISEASE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
NECK;
PHYSIOTHERAPY;
PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZATION;
SHOULDER;
TENNIS ELBOW;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
INTRAARTICULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
META ANALYSIS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
ADULT;
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL;
FEMALE;
GLUCOCORTICOIDS;
HUMANS;
INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NAPROXEN;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
TENNIS ELBOW;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 27744502060
PISSN: 00034967
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.029363 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (10)
|