Accounting Educators' Concerns About the AECC Position and Issues Statements

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 24-27

  Lux, Daniel F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744487263     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320009599046     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission. 1996. Position and issue statements of the Accounting Education Change Commission, Sarasota, FLA: American Accounting Association.
2. Baldwin, B. A., and Ingram, R. W., 1991. Rethinking the objectives and content of elementary accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 9: 1–14.
3. Ball, D. L., 1997. “ Developing mathematics reform: What don't we know about teacher learning—But would make a good hypothesis ”. In Reflecting on our own work, Edited by: Friel, S. N., and Bright, G. W., 77–109. New York: University Press of America.
4. Brown, C. A., and Borko, H., 1992. “ Becoming a mathematics teacher ”. In N.C.T.M. handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. A., 209–239. New York: Macmillan.
5. Franci, M. C., Mulder, T. C., and Stark, J. S., 1995. Intentional learning: A process for learning to learn in the accounting curriculum, Sarasota, GA: American Accounting Association.
6. Hall, G. E., George, A. A., and Rutherford, W. L., 1986. Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire, Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
7. Hall, G. E., and Hord, S. M., 1987. Change in schools: Facilitating the process, Albany: SUNY.
8. Hasselback, J. R., 1998. 1998–1999 accounting faculty directory, New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Holt, D. D., and Swanson, J. G., 1995. Use of AECC directives and cooperative learning theory in introductory accounting classes. The Journal of Education for Business, 70 (6): 348–350.
10. Ingram, R. W., and Howard, T. P., 1998. The association between course objectives and grading methods in introductory accounting courses. Issues in Accounting Education, 13 (4): 815–832.
11. Jennings, R. G., 1998. Concepts before rules: A new approach to intermediate accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 13 (4): 833–849.
12. Loucks-Horsley, S., and Stiegelbauer, S., 1991. “ Using knowledge of change to guide staff development ”. In Staff development for education in the ′90s: New demands for new realities, Edited by: Lieberman, A., and Miller, L., 15–36. New York: Teacher College Press. New Perspectives
13. Prawat, R. S., 1992. Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100 (3): 354–395.
14. Rhile, J. E., 1998. 1997–1998 two-year college accounting faculty directory, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
15. Saudagaran, S. M., 1996. The first course in accounting: An innovative approach. Issues in Accounting Education, 11 (1): 83–94.
16. Williams, D. Z., 1991. “ The accounting education change commission and curriculum development ”. In Models of accounting education, Edited by: Sundem, G. L., and Norgaard, C. T., 33–37. Torrance, CA: Accounting Education Change Commission.
17. Williams, D. Z., 1994. “ Strategies for change in accounting education: The U.S. experiment ”. In Accounting education for the 21st century, Edited by: Burns, J. O., and Needles, B. E., 207–211. New York: Pergamon Press.
18. Wilson, T. E., and Baldion, E. F., 1995. The accounting education change commission and accounting principles courses: A survey of accounting programs. The Journal of Education for Business, 70 (3): 157–159.