Reports of parallel group-controlled clinical trials: What needs to be there?

Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 171-173

  Brown, Dorothy Cimino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744485314     PISSN: 14793261     EISSN: 14764431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2005.00144.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Hennekens CH. Epidemiology in Medicine, 1st edn. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 1987.
2. Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials. A Methodologic Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
3. Kramer MS, Shapiro SH. Scientific challenges in the application of randomized trials. J Am Med Assoc 1984; 252:2739-2745.
4. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001; 323:42-46.
5. Halpern SD. Evaluating preference effects in partially unblinded, randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56:109-115.
6. Hollis S. A graphical sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with non-ignorable missing binary outcome. Stat Med 2002; 21:3823-3834.
7. Ruiz-Canela M. Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality. BMJ 2000; 320:1007.