Critical success factors for strategic telemedicine planning in New Zealand

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 600-607

  Al Qirim, Nabeel A Y ^a  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; PERSONNEL; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM 9HIS); STAKEHOLDERS;

TELEMEDICINE;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEW ZEALAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 27744483593     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2005.11.600     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. National Telehealth Plan for Australia and New Zealand. National Health Information Management Advisory Council. Canberra: Australia, 2002.
2. New Zealand Health Information Service (NZHIS). Health Information Strategy for the Year 2000. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1996.
3. New Zealand Health Information Service (NZHIS). Health Information Strategy for the Year 2000: Stocktake of Current Position and Future Plans. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1995.
4. Neame R. Issues in Developing and Implementing a Health Information System. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1995.
5. New Zealand Health Information Service (NZHIS). Health Information Strategy for the Year 2000: Gaps, Overlaps, and Issues Report. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1995.
6. Bangs I, Baldwin L, Clarke M, Hands L, Jones R, Mahaffey W. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:215-221.
7. Al-Qirim. Teledermatology: the case of adoption and diffusion of telemedicine Health Waikato in New Zealand. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:167-178.
8. Al-Qirim N. The strategic planning of health information systems in New Zealand: A telemedicine perspective. Int J Healthcare Technol Management 2003; 6(2):189-209.
9. Edelstein S. Careful telemedicine planning limits costly liability exposure. Healthcare Financial Management 1999;53:63-69.
10. Huston T, Huston J. Is telemedicine a practical reality?. Assn Computing Machinery. Commun ACM 2000; 43:91-95.
11. Lemberis A, Olsson S. Intelligent biomedical clothing for personal health and disease management: State of the art and future vision. Telemed J e-Health 2003; 9:379-386.
12. Charles B. Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access. Healthcare Financial Management Assn 2000;54:66-69.
13. Givens G, Blanarovich A, Murphy T. Internet-based tele-audiometry system for the assessment of hearing: A pilot study. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:375-378.
14. Wayman G. The maturing of TMVC technology Part I. Health Syst Rev 1994;27:57-62.
15. Noring S. Telemedicine and telehealth: principles, policies, performance, and pitfalls. Am J Pub Health 2000;90:1322.
16. Oakley A, Astwood D, Loane M, Duffill M, Rademaker M, Wooton R. Diagnosis accuracy of teledermatology: results of a preliminary study in New Zealand. N Zealand Med J 1997;51-53.
17. Perednia D, Allen A. TMVC Technology and Clinical Applications. J Am Med Assn 1995;273:483-488.
18. Anderson J. Clearing the way for physicians: Use of clinical information systems. Commun ACM 1997;40: 83-90.
19. th Annual Telemedicine Program Review. Telemed Today 1997;5:38-42.
20. Harris K, Donaldson J, Campbell J. Introducing computer-based telemedicine in three rural Missouri countries. J End User Computing 2001;13:26-35.
21. Hassol A. Surprise from the rural telemedicine survey. Telemed Today 1996;4:5-41.
22. Oakley A, Duffill M, Astwood D, Reeve P. Melanoma-Diagnosis by telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 1996;2:174-175.
23. Oakley A, Duffill M, Astwood M, Reeve P. Practicing dermatology via telemedicine. N Zealand Med J 1998;296-299.
24. Oakley A, Kerr P, Duffill M, Rademaker M, Fleisch P, Bradford N, Mills C. Patient cost-benefits of real time teledermatology-a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand. J Telemed Telecare 2000;2:97-101.
25. Telehealth Think Tank (Tank). (2000). In: Proceedings of Telehealth Think Tank. Melbourne, Australia: ANZ Telehealth Committee.
26. Project for Rural Health Communications and Information Technologies (PRHCIT). Telehealth in rural and remote Australia. Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Australia, 1996.
27. Aoki N, Dunn K. Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:393-401.
28. Implementing the New Zealand Health Strategy (NZHIS). The Minister of Health's third report on progress on the New Zealand Health Strategy. Hon Annette King, Minister of Health, December, 2003.
29. Coile R. Jr. E-health: Reinventing healthcare in the information age. J Healthcare Management 2000;45:206-210.
30. Hu P, Chau P, Sheng O, Tam K. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Management Information Systems 1999;16:91-112.
31. Austin C. Information Systems for Health Services Administration. Michigan: AUPHA Press/Health Administration Press, 1992.
32. Dimmick S, Burgiss S, Robbons S, Black D, Jarnagin B, Anders M. Outcomes of an integrated telehealth network. Demonstration project. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:13-23.
33. Australian New Zealand Telehealth Committee (ANZTC). Australian Telehealth Services Issues Paper, 1996.
34. Edwards M, Patel R. (2003). Telemedicine in the state of Maine: a model for growth driven by rural needs. Telemed J e-Health 2003;9:25-39.