Laparoscopic right nephrectomy using a novel technique to excise an inferior vena-caval cuff in a porcine model

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1032-1035

  El Galley, Rizk ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUTURE MATERIAL;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLIP; EXPERIMENTAL EXCISION; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY VEIN; LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NEEDLE; NEPHRECTOMY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RIGHT HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY; SAFETY; STAPLER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; TUMOR THROMBUS;

ANIMALS; DISSECTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANIMAL; NEPHRECTOMY; POLYPROPYLENES; RENAL VEINS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SUTURES; SWINE; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 27744474813     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1032     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1370.
2. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995;60:1047.
3. Fugita OE, Chan DY, Roberts WW, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: Outcomes and technical considerations. Urology 2004;63:247.
4. Anast JW, Stoller ML, Meng MV, Master VA, Mitchell JA, Bassett WW, Kane CJ. Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy. J Urol 2004;172:2287.
5. Steinberg AP, Finelli A, Desai MM, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 2004;172:2172.
6. El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA. Donor nephrectomy: A comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2004;171:40.
7. Goel MC, Modlin CS, Mottoo AM, et al. Fate of donor kidney: Laparoscopic versus open technique. J Urol 2004;172:2326.
8. Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: Outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1889.
9. Fergany AF, Gill IS, Schweizer DK, Kaouk JH, El-Fettouh HA, Cherullo EE, Meraney AM, Sung GT. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy: Survival porcine study. J Urol 2002;168:2629.
10. Turk IA, Deger S, Davis JW, Giesing M, Fabrizio MD, Schonberger B, Jordan GH, Loening SA. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: A new technique with preservation of vascular length. J Urol 2002;167:630.
11. Novick AC. Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2004;15:6322S.
12. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004;171:47.
13. Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: Lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 2004;136:881.
14. Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of outcomes. J Urol 2001;166:1270.
15. Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: The first randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2003;35:2553.