Finding the right compass for issue-mapping in neuroimaging

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 27-29

  Downie, Jocelyn ^a   Hadskis, Michael ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOOTROPIC AGENT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIVACY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROSCIENCES; NOOTROPIC AGENTS; PRIVACY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 27744471631     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590960285     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Cho, M. K. 2002. Conflicts of interest in magnetic resonance imaging: Issues in clinical practice and research. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(2): 73-77.
2. Hinton V. J. 2002. Ethics of neuroimaging in pediatric development. Brain and Cognition 50(3): 455-468.
3. Illes, J., and E. Racine 2005. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 5-18.
4. Kulynych, J. 2002. Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: Human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain and Cognition 50(3): 345-357.
5. Wolpe, P. R. 2002. Treatment, enhancement, and the ethics of neurotherapies. Brain and Cognition 50(3): 387-395.