Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL): Array SA40 versus Acri.Twin;Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Implantation multifokaler Intraokularlinsen (MIOL): Array® SA40 versus Acri.Twin®

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 102, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1051-1056

  Mester, U ^a,b   Dillinger, P ^a   Anterist, N ^a   Kaymak, H ^a  

^a Augenklinik der Bundesknappschaft   (Germany)

^b Augenklinik der Bundesknappschaft   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Diffractive optic design; Multifocal intraocular lenses; Uncorrected near vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MULTIFOCAL LENS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOPIC VISION; PUPIL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 27744459888     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: 14330423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-005-1217-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Auffarth GU, Dick HB (2001) Multifokale Intraokularlinsen. Ophthalmologe 98: 127-137
2. Dick B, Eisenmann D, Fabian D, Schwenn O (1999) Refraktive Kataraktchirurgie mit Multifokallinsen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, p 112
3. Dick HB, Schwenn O, Krummenauer F, Weidler S, Pfeiffer N (2001) Refraktion, Vorderkammertiefe, Dezentrierung und Tilt nach Implantation monofokaler und multifokaler Silikonlinsen. Ophthalmologe 98: 380-386
4. Dick HB, Tehrani M, Brauweiler P et al. (2002) Komplikationen faltbarer Intraokularlinsen mit der Folge der Explantation von 1998 und 1999. Ophthalmologe 99: 438-443
5. Hayashi K, Harada M, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1997) Decentration and tilt of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and acrylic soft intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 104: 793-798
6. Jacobi KW, Eisenmann D (1993) Asymmetrical multizone lenses: a new concept of multifocal intraocular lenses. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 202: 309-314
7. Javitt JC, Steinert RF (2000) Cataract extraction with multifocal IOL implantation: A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 107: 2040-2048
8. Leaming DV (2003) Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members - 2002 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 1412-1420
9. Liekfeld A, Walkow T et al. (1998) Prospektiver Vergleich zweier Multifokallinsenmodelle. Der Ophthalmologe 95:253-256
10. Liekfeld A, Hartmann C, Rieck PW, Klemm UM, Rentsch FJ (2003) Zwei faltbare Silikon-Multifokallinsen im Vergleich. 17. Kongress der DGII. Biermann, Köln, S153-159
11. Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N (2003) Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 652-660
12. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29: 703-711
13. Mutlu FM, Bilge AH, Altinsoy HI, Yamusak E (1998) The role of capsulorhexis and intraocular lens type on tilt and decentration of polymethylmethacrylate and foldable acrylic lenses. Ophthalmologica 212: 359-363
14. Pieh S, Lackner B et al. (2001) Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85 816-821
15. Pieh S, Marvan P et al. (2002) Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 23-28
16. Richter-Mueksch S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W (2002) Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28: 1957-1963
17. Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer F et al. (2000) Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol 84: 1109-1112
18. Steinert RF, Aker CL, Trentacoast DJ, Smith PJ, Tarantino N (1999) A prospective comparative study of the AMO zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 106: 1243-1255