Evaluation of threshold values of acceleration severity index by using event data recorder technology

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1904, 2005, Pages 37-45

  Gabauer, Douglas ^a   Gabler, Hampton C ^b  

^a Rowan University   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CORRELATION METHODS; CRASHWORTHINESS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; RISK MANAGEMENT; ROADS AND STREETS;

ACCELERATION SEVERITY INDEX (ASI); FULL-SCALE CRASH TESTS; THRESHOLD VALUES;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 27744456678     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1904-04     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ross, H. E., D. L. Sicking, R. A. Zimmer, and J. D. Michie. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
2. Road Restraint Systems, Part 2: Performance Classes, Impact Test Acceptance Criteria and Test Methods for Safety Barriers. European Standard EN-1317-2. European Committee for Standardization, 1998.
3. Mak, K. K., R. P. Bligh, and L. I. Griffin. Improvement of the Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Roadside Features. NCHRP Project 22-14 Final Report. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
4. Weaver, G. D., and H. L. Marquis. Safety Aspects of Roadside Slope Combinations (Abridgment). In Highway Research Record 518, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 25-28.
5. Chi, M. Assessment of Injury Criteria in Roadside Barrier Tests. Report FHWA-RD-75-74. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1976.
6. General Specification for Seat System: Upward Ejection, Aircraft. MIL-S-9479A. U.S. Air Force, June 16, 1967.
7. Hyde, A. S. Biodynamics and Crashworthiness of Vehicle Structures. Vol. 3, Wyle Laboratories Report WR68-3. March 1968.
8. Council, F. M., and J. R. Stewart. Attempt to Define Relationship Between Forces to Crash-Test Vehicles and Occupant Injury in Similar Real-World Crashes. In Transportation Research Record 1419, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 78-85.
9. Bronstad, M. E., and J. D. Michie. NCHRP Report 153: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974.
10. Transportation Research Circular 191: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Feb. 1978.
11. Shojaati, M. Correlation Between Injury Risk and Impact Severity Index ASI. Proc., Third Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita/Ascona, March 19-21, 2003.
12. Event Data Recorders: Summary of Findings by the NHTSA EDR Working Group. Final Report. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Aug. 2001.
13. Gabler, H. C., C. E. Hampton, and J. Hinch. Crash Severity: A Comparison of Event Data Recorder Measurements with Accident Reconstruction Estimates. SAE Paper 2004-01-1194. Society of Automotive Engineers, March 2004.
14. Chidester, A., J. Hinch, T. Mercer, and K. Schultz. Recording Automotive Crash Event Data. Proc., International Symposium on Transportation Recorders, Arlington, Va., May 1999.
15. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 revision, update 98. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, Ill.
16. Correia, J. T., K. A. Iliadis, E. S. McCarron, and M. A. Smole. Utilizing Data from Automotive Event Data Recorders. Proc., Canadian Multi-disciplinary Road Safety Conference XII, London, Ontario, Canada, June 10-13, 2001.