Can we scan for truth in a society of liars?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 58-60

  Buller, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BRAIN MAPPING; CONFIDENTIALITY; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHICS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NOTE; PRIVACY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BRAIN MAPPING; CONFIDENTIALITY; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; PRIVACY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 27744448306     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160590960942     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Hart, A. J., _ 2000. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport 11:2351-2355.
2. Illes, J. 2003. Neuroethics in a new era of neuroimaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology 24(9): 1739-1741.
3. Kulynych, J. 2002. Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: Human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain and Cognition 50(3): 345-357.
4. Phelps, E. A. _ 2000. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:729-738.
5. Wolpe P. R., K. R. Foster, and D. D. Langleben. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics 5(2): 39-49.