Process optimization in navigated total knee arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Walde, Tim Alexander ^a   Burgdorf, Dirk ^b   Walde, Hans Joachim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b Nordwestkrankenhaus Sanderbusch ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALGUS KNEE; VARUS KNEE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 27744448301     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Saleh KJ. Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:31-34.
2. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59:77-79.
3. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248:15-20.
4. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop. 2002; 404:7-13.
5. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation-preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139:109-116.
6. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:282-288.
7. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87:18-28.
8. Jenny JY, Boeri C: Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87:645-652.
9. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Gosse F. Early experience with knee navigation systems. Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Melbourne, 2002.
10. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248:13-14.
11. Thelen M, Ritter G, Bücheler E. Radiologische Diagnostik der Verletzungen von Knochen and Gelenken. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag. 1993:67-74.
12. Kiefer H, Langemeyer D, Schmerwitz U. Computer-supported navigation in knee arthroplasty. Eur J Trauma. 2001; 1:128-132.