Socio-economic development and sotfware piracy. An empirical assessment

Applied Economics

Volumn 37, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 2091-2097

  Banerjee, Dyuti ^a   Khalid, Ahmed M ^a   Sturm, Jan Egbert ^b  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 27744432310     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500293276     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Banerjee, D. S. (2003) Software piracy: a strategic analysis and policy instruments, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 97-127.
2. Burke, A. E. (1996) How effective are international copyright conventions in the music industry?, Journal of Cultural Economics, 20, 51-66.
3. Business Software Alliance (2002) Seventh Annual BSA global Software Piracy Study: Trends in Software Piracy, International Planning and Research Corporation, Washington, DC.
4. Chen, Y. and Png, I. (999) Software pricing and copyright: enforcement against end users, SSRN Working Paper series.
5. Cheng, H. K., Sims, R. R. and Teegen, H. (1997) To purchase or pirate software: an empirical study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 49-60.
6. Conner, K. R. and Rumelt, R. P. (1991) Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies, Management Science, 37(2), 125-37.
7. Freedom House (2001) Freedom in the world: rating system for political rights and civil liberties, http://www.freedomhouse.org.
8. Gopal, R. D. and Sanders, G. L. (1997) Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy, Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 29-47.
9. Gopal, R. D. and Sanders, G. L. (1998) International software piracy: analysis of key issues and impacts, Information Systems Research, 9(4), 380-97.
10. Gopal, R. D. and Sanders, G. L. (2000) Global software piracy: you can't get blood out of a turnip, Communications of the ACM, 43(9), 82-9.
11. Harbaugh, R. and Khemka, R. (2000) Does copyright enforcement encourage piracy?, Working Paper, Claremont McKenna College.
12. Heritage Foundation, The (1999) 1999 Index of economic freedom, Heritage Public Relations, http://www.heritage.org.
13. International Monetary Fund (2002) World Economic Outlook, Washington, DC.
14. Marron, D. B. and Steel, D. G. (2000) Which countries protect intellectual property? The case of software piracy, Economic Inquiry, 38, 159-74.
15. Nascimento, F. and Vanhonacker, W. R. (1988) Optimal strategic pricing of reproducible consumer products, Management Science, 34(8), 921-37.
16. Noyelle, T. (1990) Computer software and computer services in five Asian countries, in United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/United Nations Development Programme (UNCTAD/UNDP), Services in Asia and the Pacific: Selected Papers, Vol. 1, United Nations, New York.
17. Oz, S. and Thisse, J. F. (1999) A strategic approach to software protection, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8(2), 163-90.
18. Shin, S. K., Gopal, R. D. Sanders, G. L. and Whinston, A. B. (2004) Global software piracy revisited: beyond economics, Communications of the ACM, 47(1), 103-7.
19. Silva, F. and Ramello, G. B. (2000) Sound recording market: the ambiguous case of copyright and piracy, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 415-42.
20. Stolpe, M. (2000) Protection against software piracy: a study of technological adoption for the enforcement of intellectual property rights, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 25-52.
21. Takeyama, L. (1994) The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of network externalities, Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(2), 155-66.
22. UNDP (2000) World income inequality database (WIID), United Nations University, WIDER, http://undp.org/poverty.
23. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), http://www.wipo.org