The embodied nature of implicit theories: The consistency of ideas about the nature of matter

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 351-387

  Pozo, Juan Ignacio ^a   Gómez Crespo, Miguel Ángel ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b I E S Victoria Kent   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644587260     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2303_2     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
2. Attran, S. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3. Au, T. K.-F. (1994). Developing an intuitive understanding of substance kinds. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 71-111.
4. Benlloch, M., & Pozo, J. I. (1996). What changes in conceptual change? From ideas to theories. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science and education in Europe (pp. 200-211). London: Palmer.
5. Caravita, S., & Hallden, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89-111.
6. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Carey, S. (1995). On the origins of causal understanding. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 268-302). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
8. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change (pp. 3-28). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J., & Leeuw, W. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
11. Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Damasio, A. (1996). El error de Descartes [Descartes's error]. Barcelona, Spain: Crítica.
13. de Vega, M. (1997). Embodiment and language-based memory: Some qualifications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 22-23.
14. Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808.
15. diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
16. diSessa, A. (1994). Speculations on the foundations of knowledge and intelligence. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), Implicit and explicit knowledge: An educational approach (pp. 1-54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. diSessa, A. (1996). What do "just plain folk" know about physics? In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Handbook of education and human development (pp. 709-736). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
18. Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change. Approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263-282). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
19. Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students' conceptual frame-works across different task contexts. Science Education, 70, 473-496.
20. Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21-45.
21. Gabel, D., & Bunce, D. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301-326). New York: Macmillan.
22. Glenberg, A. (1997). What memory is for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
23. Gómez Crespo, M. A., & Pozo, J. I. (2000). La comprensión de la estructura de la materia: discontinuidad y vacío [The understanding of the structure of matter: Discontinuity and vacuum]. Tarbiya, 26, 117-139.
24. Gómez Crespo, M. A., & Pozo, J. I. (2001). La consistencia de las teorías sobre la naturaleza de la materia: Una comparación entre las teorías científicas y las teorías imphícitas [The consistency of theories on the nature of matter: A comparison between scientific and implicit theories]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24, 441-459.
25. Gómez Crespo, M. A., & Pozo, J. I. (2004). From everyday to scientific knowledge: understanding how matter changes. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1325-1343.
26. Gómez Crespo, M. A., Pozo, J. I., & Sanz, A. (1995). Students' ideas on conservation of matter: effects of expertise and context variables. Science Education, 79, 77-93.
27. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Keil, F. C. (1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 234-262). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
30. Keil, F. C., & Silberstein, C. S. (1996). Schooling and the acquisition of theoretical knowledge. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 621-645). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
31. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
32. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modelling material kind. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 39-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: the origins of "theory of mind." Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
34. Leslie, A. (1995). A theory of agency. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 121-141). Oxford, England: Claredon.
35. Leslie, A. (2000). How to acquire a representational theory of mind. In D. Sperber (Ed.), Metarepresentations. A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 197-223). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Limón, M., & Mason, L. (Eds.). (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Millás, J. J. (2000). Cuerpo y prótests [Body and prosthesis]. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones El Pais.
38. Mortimer, E. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science and Education, 4, 267-285.
39. Mortimer, E. (1998). Multivoiceness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter. International journal of Science Education, 20, 67-82.
40. Nuñez, R., & Freeman, W. (Eds.). (2000). Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion. Thoverton, England: Imprinting Academic.
41. Oliva, J. M. (1996). Estudios sobre consistencia en las ideas de los alumnos en ciencias [Studies on the consistency of students' ideas in science]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 14, 87-92.
42. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.
43. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). Learning and development: The implicit knowledge-assumption re-considered. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 495-531). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Posner, F. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
45. Pozo, J. I. (1997, August). Conceptual change as a process of restructuring, explicitation and hierarchical integration. Paper presented at the seventh European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Atenas, Greece.
46. Pozo, J. I. (2001) Humana mente: El mundo, la conciencia y la carne [Human mind: The world, the consciousness and the flesh]. Madrid, Spain: Morata.
47. Pozo, J. I. (2003). Adquisición de conocimiento: Cuando la carne se hace verbo [Knowledge acquisition: When the flesh becomes word]. Madrid, Spain: Morata.
48. Pozo, J. I., & Carretero, M. (1992). Causal theories, reasoning strategies and conflict resolution by experts and novices in Newtonian mechanics. In A. Demetriou, M. Shayer, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Neopiagetian theories of cognitive development (pp. 231-255). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
49. Pozo, J. I., & Gómez Crespo, M. A. (1998). Aprender y enseñar ciencia. Del conocimiento cotidiano al conocimiento científico [Teaching and learning science: From everyday knowledge to scientific knowledge]. Madrid, Spain: Morata.
50. Pozo, J. I., Gömez Crespo, M. A., & Sanz, A. (1999). When conceptual change does not mean replacement: Different representations for different contexts. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 161-174). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
51. Pozo, J. I., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Del cambio de contenido al cambio representacional en el conocimiento conceptual [From content change to representational change in conceptual knowledge]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24, 407-423.
52. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Reiner, M., Slotta, J., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 1-16.
54. Rivière, A. (2000). Teoria de la mente y metarepresentación [Theory of mind and metarepresentation]. In P. Chacón & M. Rodríguez (Eds.), Pensando la mente. Perspectivas en Filosofía y Psicología (pp. 271-324). Madrid, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.
55. Rodrigo, M. J. (1993). Representaciones y procesos en las teorías implicitas [Representations and processes in implicit theories]. In M. J. Rodrigo, A. Rodríguez, & J. Marrero (Eds.), Las teorías implícitas: Una aproximación al conocimiento cotidiano (pp. 95-122). Madrid, Spain: Visor.
56. Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S., & Carretero, M. (Eds.). (1999). New perspectives on conceptual change. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
57. Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students' misconceptions of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 373-400.
58. Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 30, 431-445.
59. Spelke, E., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infant's knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44-78). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
60. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
61. Stavy, R. (1995). Conceptual development of basic ideas in chemistry. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in schools (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
62. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis)understand science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
63. Thagard, P. R. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
65. Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3-14). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
66. Wellman, H., & Gelman, S. (1997). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 523-573). New York: Wiley.