Motion correction in PET/CT

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 44, Issue 5 A SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages

  Schäfers, Klaus P ^a,b   Dawood, M ^a   Lang, N ^a   Buther F ^a   Schafers M ^a   Schober, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

PET CT

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA N 13;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEART MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTION; PHANTOM; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SIMULATION; SYSTOLE; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 27644582527     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625215     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ter-Pogossian MM, Bergmann SR, Sobel BE. Influence of cardiac and respiratory motion on tomographic reconstructions of the heart: implications for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 1148-55.
2. Hoffmann EJ, Phelps ME, Wisenberg G et al. Electrocardiographic gating in positron emission computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979; 3: 733-9.
3. Stegger L, Biedenstein S, Schäfers KP et al. Elastic surface contour detection for the measurement of ejection fraction in myocardial perfusion SPET. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 48-55.
4. Freiberg J, Hove JD, Kofoed KF et al. Absolute quantitation of left ventricular wall and cavity parameters using ECG-gated PET. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11: 38-46.
5. 18F-FDG PET images to assess left ventricular geometry and contractile function. J Nucl. Med 2003; 44: 1741-6.
6. Susskind H, Alderson PO, Dzebolo NN et al. Effect of respiratory motion on pulmonary activity by positron tomography in dogs. Invest Radiol 1985; 20: 950-5.
7. Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. Semin Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 33: 166-79.
8. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T et al. Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med 2003; 30: 588-96.
9. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y et al. Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 603-6.
10. Lucas BD, Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proceedings of Imaging Understanding Workshop 1981; 121-30.
11. Horn B, Schunck B. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence 1981; 17: 185-203.
12. Segars WP. Development of a new dynamic NURBS-based cardiac torso (NCAT) phantom. PhD dissertation, The University of North Carolina, 2001.
13. 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 608-13.
14. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C et al. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 323-8.
15. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1081-6.
16. Klein GJ. Deformable Models for Volume Feature Tracking. PhD Dissertation 1999, The University of California, Berkeley.
17. Lu W, Mackie TR. Tomographic motion detection and correction directly in sinogram space. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47: 1267-84.
18. Bühler P, Just U, Will E et al. An accurate method for correction of head movement in PET. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2004; 23: 1176-85.
19. Livieratos L, Stegger L, Bloomfield PM et al. Rigid-body transformation of list-mode projection data for respiratory motion correction in cardiac PET. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 3313-22.