Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 665-672

  Kollman, Craig ^a   Wilson, Darrell M ^b   Wysocki, Tim ^c   Tamborlane, William V ^d   Beck, Roy W ^a  

^a JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEMOURS CHILDREN S CLINIC   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ERROR GRID ANALYSIS; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; REPEATED MEASURES ANALYSIS; SENSOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 27644565961     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.665     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL: Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622-628.
2. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH: A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1143-1148.
3. Gough DA, Botvinick EL: Reservations on the use of error grid analysis for the validation of blood glucose assays. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1034-1036.
4. Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev BP, Julian DM, Clarke WL: Understanding error grid analysis. Diabetes Care 1997;20:911-912.
5. Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clarke WL: Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: Continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1922-1928.
6. Hartley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
7. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group: The accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in children with type 1 diabetes: Results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:791-800.
8. Neese JW, Duncan P, Bayse D, Robinson M, Cooper T, Stewart C: Development and Evaluation of a Hexokinase/Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Procedure for Use as a National Glucose Reference Method. HEW Publication No. (CDC) 77-8330. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control, 1976.
9. Passey RB, Gillum RL, Fuller JB, Urry FM, Giles ML: Evaluation and comparison of 10 glucose methods and the reference method recommended in the proposed product class standard (1974). Clin Chem 1977;23:131-139.
10. International Organisation for Standardization: In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems-Requirements for Blood-Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing in Managing Diabetes Mellitus. ISO 15197:2003. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization, 2003.
11. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1980.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
13. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group: The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: Results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:781-789.
14. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group: Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer and the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System during hypoglycemia: Experience of the Diabetes Research in Children Network. Diabetes Care 2004;27:722-726.
15. Klonoff DC: The need for separate performance goals for glucose sensors in the hypoglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic ranges [editorial]. Diabetes Care 2004;27:834-836.
16. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
17. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group: GlucoWatch G2 Biographer alarm reliability during hypoglycemia in children. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:559-566.
18. Kovatchev BP, Straume M, Cox D, Farhy LS: Risk analysis of blood glucose data: A quantitative approach to optimizing the control of insulin dependent diabetes. Theor Med 2000;3:1-10.