Encoding a temporally structured stimulus with a temporally structured neural representation

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1568-1576

  Brown, Stacey L ^a   Joseph, Joby ^a   Stopfer, Mark ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; NERVE CELL; ODOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; GRASSHOPPERS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; ODORS; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 27644554392     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn1559     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Fuster, J.M. & Jervey, J.P. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361-375 (1982).
2. Richmond, B.J., Optican, L.M., Podell, M. & Spitzer, H. Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate inferior temporal cortex. I. Response characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 57, 132-146 (1987).
3. McClurkin, J.W., Optican, L.M., Richmond, B.J. & Gawne, T.J. Concurrent processing and complexity of temporally encoded neuronal messages in visual perception. Science 253, 675-677 (1991).
4. Meister, M. Multineuronal codes in retinal signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 609-614 (1996).
5. Nagarajan, S.S. et al. Representation of spectral and temporal envelope of twitter vocalizations in common marmoset primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 1723-1737 (2002).
6. Gehr, D.D., Komiya, H. & Eggermont, J.J. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls. Hear. Res. 150, 27-42 (2000).
7. Machens, C.K. et al. Representation of acoustic communication signals by insect auditory receptor neurons. J. Neurosci. 21, 3215-3227 (2001).
8. Jones, L.M., Depireux, D.A., Simons, D.J. & Keller, A. Robust temporal coding in the trigeminal system. Science 304, 1986-1989 (2004).
9. Arabzadeh, E., Zorzin, E. & Diamond, M.E. Neuronal encoding of texture in the whisker sensory pathway. PLoS Biol. 3, E17 (2005).
10. Jones, L.M., Lee, S., Trageser, J.C., Simons, D.J. & Keller, A. Precise temporal responses in whisker trigeminal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 665-668 (2004).
11. Laurent, G. & Davidowitz, H. Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265, 1872-1875 (1994).
12. Hamilton, K.A. & Kauer, J.S. Responses of mitral/tufted cells to orthodromic and antidromic electrical stimulation in the olfactory bulb of the tiger salamander. J. Neurophysiol. 59, 1736-1755 (1988).
13. Meredith, M. Patterned response to odor in mammalian olfactory bulb: the influence of intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 56, 572-597 (1986).
14. Laurent, G., Wehr, M. & Davidowitz, H. Temporal representations of odors in an olfactory network. J. Neurosci. 16, 3837-3847 (1996).
15. Wehr, M. & Laurent, G. Odour encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies. Nature 384, 162-166 (1996).
16. Lestienne, R. Spike timing, synchronization and information processing on the sensory side of the central nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 65, 545-591 (2001).
17. Theunissen, F. & Miller, J.P. Temporal encoding in nervous systems: a rigorous definition. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2, 149-162 (1995).
18. Laurent, G., MacLeod, K., Stopfer, M. & Wehr, M. Dynamic representation of odours by oscillating neural assemblies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91, 7-18 (1999).
19. Laurent, G. A systems perspective on early olfactory coding. Science 286, 723-728 (1999).
20. Murlis, J. & Jones, C.D. Fine-scale structure of odor plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources. Physiol. Entomol. 6, 71-86 (1981).
21. Hildebrand, J.G. & Shepherd, G.M. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: Converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 595-631 (1997).
22. Wehr, M. & Laurent, G. Relationship between afferent and central temporal patterns in the locust olfactory system. J. Neurosci. 19, 381-390 (1999).
23. Bazhenov, M. et al. Model of cellular and network mechanisms for odor-evoked temporal patterning in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 30, 569-581 (2001).
24. Perez-Orive, J. et al. Oscillations and sparsening of odor representations in the mushroom body. Science 297, 359-365 (2002).
25. Laurent, G. & Naraghi, M. Odorant-induced oscillations in the mushroom bodies of the locust. J. Neurosci. 14, 2993-3004 (1994).
26. Stopfer, M., Jayaraman, V. & Laurent, G. Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron 39, 991-1004 (2003).
27. Murlis, J., Elkinton, J.S. & Carde, R.T. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505-532 (1992).
28. Roweis, S.T. & Saul, L.K. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290, 2323-2326 (2000).
29. Bau, J., Justus, K.A. & Carde, R.T. Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. J. Insect Physiol. 48, 433-442 (2002).
30. Barrozo, R.B. & Kaissling, K.E. Repetitive stimulation of olfactory receptor cells in female silkmoths Bombyx mori L. J. Insect Physiol. 48, 825-834 (2002).
31. Marion-Poll, F. & Tobin, T.R. Temporal coding of pheromone pulses and trains in Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 505-512 (1992).
32. Lemon, W. & Getz, W. Temporal resolution of general odor pulses by olfactory sensory neurons in American cockroaches. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1809-1819 (1997).
33. Lei, H. & Hansson, B.S. Central processing of pulsed pheromone signals by antennal lobel neurons in the male moth Agrotis segetum. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1113-1122 (1999).
34. Heinbockel, T., Christensen, T.A. & Hildebrand, J.G. Temporal tuning of odor responses in pheromone-responsive projection neurons in the brain of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Neurol. 409, 1-12 (1999).
35. Vickers, N.J., Christensen, T.A., Baker, T.C. & Hildebrand, J.G. Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code. Nature 410, 466-470 (2001).
36. Vickers, N.J., Christensen, T.A. & Hildebrand, J.G. Combinatorial odor discrimination in the brain: attractive and antagonist odor blends are represented in distinct combinations of uniquely identifiable glomeruli. J. Comp. Neurol. 400, 35-56 (1998).
37. Willis, M.A. & Avondet, J.L. Odor-modulated orientation in walking male cockroaches Periplaneta americana, and the effects of odor plumes of different structure. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 721-735 (2005).
38. Justus, K.A. & Carde, R.T. Flight behaviour of males of two moths, Cadra cautella and Pectinophora gossypiella, in homogeneous clouds of pheromone. Physiol. Entomol. 27, 67-75 (2002).
39. Lemon, W.C. & Getz, W.M. Rate code input produces temporal code output from cockroach antennal lobes. Biosystems 58, 151-158 (2000).
40. Jefferis, G.S. et al. Developmental origin of wiring specificity in the olfactory system of Drosophila. Development 131, 117-130 (2004).
41. Ramaekers, A. et al. Glomerular maps without cellular redundancy at successive levels of the Drosophila larval olfactory circuit. Curr. Biol. 15, 982-992 (2005).
42. Fontanini, A., Spano, P. & Bower, J.M. Ketamine-xylazine-induced slow (<1.5 Hz) oscillations in the rat piriform (olfactory) cortex are functionally correlated with respiration. J. Neurosci. 23, 7993-8001 (2003).
43. Okada, J. & Toh, Y. Spatio-temporal patterns of antennal movements in the searching cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 3693-3706 (2004).
44. Nowotny, T., Rabinovich, M.I., Huerta, R. & Abarbanel, H.D. Decoding temporal information through slow lateral excitation in the olfactory system of insects. J. Comput. Neurosci. 15, 271-281 (2003).
45. Abraham, N.M. et al. Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron 44, 865-876 (2004).
46. Bazhenov, M., Stopfer, M., Sejnowski, T.J. & Laurent, G. Fast odor learning improves reliability of odor responses in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 46, 483-492 (2005).
47. Stopfer, M. & Laurent, G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature 402, 664-668 (1999).
48. Pouzat, C., Mazor, O. & Laurent, G. Using noise signature to optimize spike-sorting and to assess neuronal classification quality. J. Neurosci. Methods 122, 43-57 (2002).
49. Joliffe, I.T. Principal Component Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).