A method for rapid, objective and structured evaluation (ROSE) of Protocol of a randomised clinical trial

Bulletin, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 22-26

  Malhotra, S ^a   Shafiq, N ^a   Pandhi, P ^a  

^a Department of Pharmacology ^*

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Method; Objective; Protocol assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 27644503212     PISSN: 03022404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variation in health care delivery. Sci Am 1973;182:1102-1108.
2. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of healthcare in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517-563.
3. Malhotra S, Bhargava VK, Grover A, Pandhi P, Sharma YP. A randomized trial to compare the efficacy, safety, costand platelet aggregation effects of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin (the ESCAPEU Trial). Int J Clin Pharmacol 2001;39:110-115.
4. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials. Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624-1632.
5. Chalmers TC. Unbiased, relevant and reliable assessments in health care. BMJ 1998;317:1167-1168.
6. http.www.CONSORT-statement.org.
7. rd Edition. Chapman & Hall/ CRC. Florida. 2000;1093-1104.
8. Malhotra S, Shafiq N. A Method for Rapid, Objective and Structured Evaluation (ROSE) of a Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial(Abstr). Proceedings of the international Sri Lankan statistical conference: visions of futuristic methodologies. Eds: Silva BM, Mukhopadhyay N. 28-30 Dec, 2004.