Development of an interactive computer-assisted instruction (ICAI) program for patient prenatal genetic screening and carrier testing for use in clinical settings

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 199-204

  Griffith, Jennifer M ^a   Sorenson, James R ^a   Jennings Grant, Tracey ^b   Fowler, Beth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Computer based education; Patient education; Prenatal genetic screening; Prenatal testing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NORTH CAROLINA; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WOMEN;

EID: 27644499713     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. R.E. Glasgow, H.G. McKay, S.M. Boles, and T.M. Vogt Interactive computer technology, behavioral science, and family practice J Fam Pract 48 1999 464 470
2. Sorenson JR. Enhancing patient prenatal education: a feasibility study. NIH-NHGRI research proposal RO1-HG02170-01A2; 2001.
3. Jennings-Grant T, Callanan NP, Griffith JM, Sorenson JR. An approach to developing an interactive computer assisted instruction (ICAI) program for prenatal genetic testing education. Chapel Hill, NC, Unpublished manuscript.
4. L.A. Sutherland, M. Campbell, K. Ornstein, B. Wildemuth, and D. Lobach Development of an adaptive multimedia program to collect patient health data Am J Prev Med 21 2001 320 324
5. Perfetti C, Landesman L. Eight is not enough. Bradford, MA: User Interface Engineering; 2001. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from User Interface Engineering. http://world.stc.com/∼uieweb/Articles/eight is not engouh.htm.
6. Nielsen J. Why you only need to test with 5 users. Alertbox; 2000. Retrieved May 19, 2004, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html.
7. Hudson W. How many users does it take to change a website? 2001, SIGCHI Bulletin, May/June 2001. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/ bulletin/2001.3/mayjun01.pdf.
8. L. Faulkner Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 35 2003 379 383
9. DeMaio TL, Rothgeb J, Hess J. Improving survey quality through pretesting. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census;1998. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/sm98-03.pdf.
10. M. Van Someren, Y. Barnard, and J. Sandberg The thinking aloud method: a practical guide to modeling cognitive processes 1994 Academic Press London
11. J. Rubin Handbook of usability testing 1994 Wiley New York