Authentication, privacy, and the federal e-government

Information Society

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 367-377

  Holden, Stephen H ^a,c   Millett, Lynette I ^b  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authentication; e government; Federal law; Privacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644464298     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240500253582     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Accenture. 2000. eGovernment Leadership - Realizing the vision. http://www.accenture.com/xdoc/en/industries/government/eGov.April2002_3.pdf (accessed April 25, 2002).
2. Baum, C., and Maio, A. D. 2000. Gartner's four phases of e-government model. http://www.gartner.com (accessed August 8, 2002).
3. Camp, L. J. 1999. Web security and privacy: An American perspective. The Information Society 15:249-256.
4. Council for Excellence in Government. 2000. E-government: The next American revolution. http://www.excelgov.org/egovpoll/report/poll_report.pdf (accessed November 15, 2001).
5. Council for Excellence in Government. 2003. The new e-government equation: ease, engagement, privacy and protection. http://www.excelgov.org/usermedia/images/uploads/PDFs/egovpoll2003.pdf (accessed June 25, 2003).
6. Culnan, M. J., and Bies, R. J. 2003. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues 59(2):323-342.
7. Deloitte Research. 2001. At the dawn of e-government: The citizen as customer. http://www.dc.com/obx/pages.php?Name=dr_pubsec_dawn_egov&seshid= 16e672d57358ae048ae3953b3bfba51a (accessed April 20, 2002).
8. Department of Commerce. 1995. Privacy and the National Information Infrastructure: Principles for providing and using personal information. National Technical Information Association. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/privwhitepaper.html (accessed March 28, 2005).
9. Department of Health Education and Welfare Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. 1973. Records, computers and the rights of citizens. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fair Credit Reporting Act. 1970. 15 (Vol. 1681).
11. Federal Trade Commission. 2000. Privacy online: Fair information practices in the electronic marketplace. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy2000/privacy2000. pdf (accessed March 30, 2004).
12. Flaherty, D. H. 2000. Privacy impact assessments: An essential tool for data protection. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of Privacy and Data Protection Officials, Venice, Italy.
13. Fletcher, Patricia D. 2002. The Government Paperwork Elimination Act: Operating instructions for an electronic government. International Journal of Public Administration 25(5): 723-736.
14. General Services Administration. 2001. About us. http://www.egov.gov/about_us.cfm (accessed January 8, 2003).
15. Government Paperwork Elimination Act. 1998. 44 U.S.C. 3504.
16. Hiller, J. S., and Bélanger, F. 2001. Privacy strategies for electronic government. In E-govemment 2001, eds. M. A. Abramson and G. E. Means, pp. 162-198. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17. Internal Revenue Service. 2000. Internal Revenue Service model information technology privacy impact assessment. Federal CIO Council 2000. http://www.cio.gov/archive/pia_for_it_irs_model.pdf (accessed January 23, 2004).
18. Internal Revenue Service. 2000. Internal Revenue Service model information technology privacy impact assessment. http://www.cio.gov/documents/pia_for_it_irs_model.pdf (accessed January 23, 2004).
19. Karol, T. J. 2001. A guide to cross-border privacy impact assessments. http://www.isaca.org/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm?ContentID=7404 (accessed August 1, 2004).
20. Layne, K., and Lee, J. 2001. Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18(2):122-136.
21. Millberg, S. J., Burke, S. J., Smith, J., and Kallman, E. A. 1995. Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches. Communications of the ACM 38(12):65-74.
22. Millett, L. I., and Holden, S. H. 2003. Authentication and its privacy effects. IEEE Internet Computing November/December:2-6.
23. National Research Council. 2002. Information technology research, innovation, and e-government. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. National Research Council. 2003. Who goes there? Authentication through the lens of privacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Office of Management and Budget. 2003a. E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy04/m04-04.pdf (accessed November 22, 2004).
26. Office of Management and Budget. 2003b. Implementing the President's management agenda for e-government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/egovstrategy.pdf (accessed November 22, 2004).
27. Office of Management and Budget. 2003c. OMB guidance for implementing the privacy provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/m03-22.html (accessed November 19, 2004).
28. Office of Management and Budget. 2005. Management of federal information resources. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a130/a130trans4.html (accessed March 7, 2005).
29. Office of the Privacy Commissioner. 2002. Privacy impact assessment handbook. http://www.privacy.org.nz/comply/pia.html (accessed June 14, 2004).
30. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1980. OECD guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data. Washington, DC: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
31. Privacy Act of 1974. 1974. 5 U.S.C. 552a.
32. Regan, P. M. 1995. Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
33. Relyea, H. C. 2000. The Privacy Act: Emerging issues and related legislation. RL30824. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
34. Temoshok, David. 2004. E-authentication: Making trust possible. http://www.cio.gov/eauthentication/ (accessed June 11, 2004).
35. Transportation Security Administration. 2004. Access requirements: Boarding pass and photo ID required to get to your gate. http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1044.xml (accessed January 23, 2004).
36. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2002. Privacy impact assessment policy. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/ciopubs/pia-pefr/paip-pefr_e.asp (accessed June 14, 2004).
37. United Nations. 2002. Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. http://www.unpan.org/e-government/Benchmarking%20E-gov%202001.pdf (accessed July 17, 2002).