Effectiveness of self-help programs in drug addiction therapy;Selvhjelpsgrupper i rusbehandling

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 125, Issue 20, 2005, Pages 2798-2801

  Kristensen, Øistein ^a   Vederhus, John Kåre ^a  

^a Avdeling for Rus og Avhengighetsbehandling   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEATH; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS; NORWAY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF HELP;

ADULT; ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NORWAY; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-HELP GROUPS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27644453431     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 00292001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kverme A. Anonyme Alkoholikere: et fellesskap til stor hjelp for alkoholikere. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1990; 110: 606-7.
2. Anonyme Narkomane. www.nanorge.org (1.7.2005).
3. Kownacki RJ, Shadish WR. Does Alcoholics Anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments. Subst Use Misuse 1999; 34: 1897-916.
4. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), Project Match Research Group. Project MATCH hypotheses: Results and causal chain analyses. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.
5. Connors GJ, Tonigan JS, Miller WR. A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, AA participation and outcome: retrospective study of the project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples. J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62: 817-25.
6. Hoffmann NG, Harrison PA, Belille CA. Alcoholics anonymous after treatment: attendance and abstinence. Int J Addict 1983; 18: 311-8.
7. Kaskutas LA, Bond J, Humphreys K. Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction 2002; 97: 891-900.
8. Zemore SE, Kaskutas LA, Ammon LN. In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction 2004; 99: 1015-23.
9. Sexton H. Alkoholmisbrukere etter klinikkbehandling: en oppfølgingsundersøkelse. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1995; 115: 2768-72.
10. Fekjær HO. Rus. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2004.
11. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders diagnostic criteria for research. Genève: World Health Organization, 1993.
12. First MB. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I) clinician version. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Press, 1997.
13. Lauritzen H, Skretting A. Det nasjonale dokumentasjonssystemet innen tiltaksapparatet for rusmiddelmisbrukere. www.sirus.no (10.3.2005).
14. Project Match research group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project Match three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 6: 1300-11.
15. Hoffmann NG, Miller NS. Perspectives of effective treatment for alcohol and drug disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1993; 16: 127-40.
16. Brown BS, O'Grady KE, Farrell EV et al. Factors associated with frequency of 12-Step attendance by drug abuse clients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2001; 27: 147-60.
17. Humphreys K, Mavis B, Stofflemayr B. Factor's predicting attendance at self-help groups after substance abuse treatment: preliminary findings. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 591-3.
18. Tomasson K, Vaglum P. Psychiatric co-morbidity and aftercare among alcoholics: a prospective study of a nationwide representative sample. Addiction 1998; 93: 423-31.
19. Mueser KT, Noordsy DL, Drake RE et al. Integrated treatment for dual disorders: a guide to effective practice. New York: Guilford Press, 2003.
20. Tournier RE. Alcoholics Anonymous as treatment and as ideology. J Stud Alcohol 1979; 40: 230-9.
21. Gjeruldsen S, Myrvang B, Opjordsmoen S. Risk factors for drug addiction and its outcome: a follow-up study over 25 years. Nord J Psychiatry 2003; 57: 373-6.