The AGREE instrument is a practical method for the evaluation of clinical guidelines. Quality examination of guidelines for asthma/allergy and diabetes in Östergötland;AGREE-instrumentet praktisk metod för utvärdering av kliniska riktlinjer: Kvalitetsgranskning av riktlinjer för astma/allergi och diabetes i Östergötland

Lakartidningen

Volumn 102, Issue 41, 2005, Pages 2942-2945

  Lindberg, Malou ^a   Schöld, Anna Karin ^a   Östgren, Carl Johan ^b   Tilling, Björn ^c   Tunér, Kajsa ^c  

^a FoU enheten För Närsjukvården I Östergötland   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c

^d Sweden

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; SWEDEN;

ASTHMA; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 27544493734     PISSN: 00237205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits. Limitation, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318:527-30.
2. Burgers J, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Makela M, Zaat J. AGREE Collaboration. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:31-45.
3. Willman A, Stotz P. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad- en bro mellan forskning och klinisk verksamhet. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2002.
4. Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård och behandling vid diabetes mellitus. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 1999.
5. Cluzaeu F, Littlejons P, Grimshaw J, Feder G, Moran S. Development and application of generic rnethodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:21-8.
6. AGREE Collaboration. Guideline development in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:1039-49.
7. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validalion of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE projekt. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-23.
8. Shaneyfelt T, Mayu-Smith M, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical litterature. JAMA 1999;281:1900-5.
9. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000;355:103-6.
10. Graham ID, Calder LA, Hébert PC, Carter AO, Tetroe JM. A comparison of clinical practice guideline appraisal instruments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:1024-38.
11. Littlejohns P, Cluzeau F, Bale R, Grimshaw J, Feder G, Moran S. The quantity and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression in primary care in the UK. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:205-10.
12. Thomson R, McElroy H, Sudlow M. Guidelines on anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation in Great Britain: Variation in content and implications for treatment. BMJ 1998;316:509-13.
13. Girol R. Editorial. Implementation of evidence and guidelines in clinical practice: a new field of research? Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:455-6.
14. Hasenfeld R, Shekelle PG. Is the methodological quality of guidelines declining in the US? Comparison of the quality of US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines with those published subsequently. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:428-34.