Reference frame and haptic discrimination of orientations in infants

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 1833-1837

  Kerzerho, Stéphanie ^a   Streri, Ariette ^a   Gentaz, Edouard ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE MENDÈS FRANCE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Haptic; Infancy; Orientation; Reference frame

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAVITATIONAL STRESS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STANDING; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KINESTHESIS; MALE; ORIENTATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REFERENCE VALUES; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 27544487565     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000183902.70030.59     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Howard I. Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley; 1982.
2. Rock I. The frame of reference. In: Rock I, editor. The legacy of Solomon Asch. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1990. pp. 243-268.
3. Appelle S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The 'oblique effect' in man and animals. Psychol Bull 1972; 78:266-278.
4. Gentaz E, Tschopp C. The oblique effect in the visual perception of orientations. In: Shovov S, editor. Advances in psychology research. Vol. 11. New York: Nova Sciences Publishers; 2002. pp. 137-163.
5. Gentaz E. Existe-t-il un 'effet de l'oblique' dans la perception tactile des orientations? [Is there an oblique effect in the tactile perception of orientations?]. L'Année Psycholog 2000; 100:111-140.
6. Luyat M, Gentaz E, Corte T, Guerraz M. Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect. Percept Psychophys 2001; 63:541-554.
7. Luyat M, Gentaz E. Body tilt effect on the reproduction of orientations: studies on the visual oblique effect and subjective orientations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002; 28:1002-1011.
8. Leehey S, Moskowitz-Cook A, Brill S, Held R. Orientational anisotropy in infant vision. Science 1975; 190:900-902.
9. Essock E, Siqueland R. Discrimination of orientation by human infants. Perception 1981; 10:245-253.
10. Jouen F. The influence of body position on perception of orientations in infants. Behav Brain Res 1985; 15:241-245.
11. Furmanski C, Engel A. An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3:535-536.
12. Gentaz E, Streri A. An oblique effect in infants' haptic perception of spatial orientations. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:253-259.
13. Gentaz E, Hatwell Y. Role of gravitational cues in the haptic perception of orientation. Percept Psychophys 1996; 58:1278-1292.
14. Gentaz E, Streri A. Infants' haptic discrimination of spatial orientations. Curr Psychol Lett 2002; 9:61-73.
15. Pascalis O, de Haan M. Recognition memory and novelty preference: what model? In: Hayne H, Fagen J, editors. Progress in infancy research. Vol. 3. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003. pp. 95-120.
16. Kappers A. The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks. Acta Psychol 2004; 117: 333-340.
17. Lipshits M, McIntyre J. Two reference frames for visual perception in two gravity conditions. Perception 2005; 34:545-555.
18. Lipshits M, McIntyre J. Gravity affects the preferred vertical and horizontal in visual perception of orientation. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 1085-1089.
19. Luyat M, Mobarek S, Leconte C, Gentaz E. The plasticity of gravitational reference frame and the subjective vertical: peripheral visual information affects the oblique effect. Neurosci Lett 2005; 385:215-219.