Oligomerization states of Bowman-Birk inhibitor by atomic force microscopy and computational approaches

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 642-648

  Silva, Luciano P ^a   Azevedo, Ricardo B ^a   Morais, Paulo C ^a   Ventura, Manuel M ^a   Freitas, Sonia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Accessible surface area; AFM; Atomic force microscopy; Docking; Proteinase inhibitor; Self assembly

Indexed keywords

BOWMAN BIRK INHIBITOR; DIMER; MONOMER; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CALCULATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THEORY; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DIMERIZATION; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TRYPSIN INHIBITOR, BOWMAN-BIRK SOYBEAN;

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 27544482791     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20646     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. Adv Protein Chem 2003;61:9-73.
2. Engel J, Kammerer RA. What are oligomerization domains good for? Matrix Biol 2000;19:283-288.
3. Jaenicke R, Böhm G. The stability of proteins in extreme environments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998;8:738-748.
4. Zhao X, Ghaffari S, Lodish H, Malashkevich VN, Kim PS. Structure of the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein oligomerization domain. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:117-120.
5. Engel A, Muller DJ. Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:715-718.
6. Leite JRSA, Silva LP, Taveira CC, Teles RCL, Freitas SM, Azevedo RB. Topographical analysis of Schizolobium parahyba chymotrypsin inhibitor (SPCI) by atomic force microscopy. Protein Peptide Lett 2002;9:179-184.
7. Silva LP. Atomic force microscopy and proteins. Protein Peptide Lett 2002;9:117-125.
8. Müller DJ, Heymann JB, Oesterhelt F, Moller C, Gaub H, Buldt G, Engel A. Atomic force microscopy of native purple membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1460:27-38.
9. Chamberlain AK, MacPhee CE, Zurdo J, Morozova-Roche LA, Hill HAO, Dobson CM, Davis JJ. Ultrastructural organization of amyloid fibrils by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2000;79:3282-3293.
10. Stoddard BL, Koshland DE. Prediction of the structure of a receptor protein complex using a binary docking method. Nature 1992;358:774-776.
11. Tovchigrechko A, Wells CA, Vakser IA. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci 2002;11:1888-1896.
12. Myshkin E, Leontis NB, Bullerjahn GS. Computational simulation of the docking of Prochlorothrix hollandica plastocyanin to photosystem I: Modeling the electron transfer complex. Biophys J 2002;82:3305-3313.
13. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8477-8482.
14. Laskowski M, Kato I. Protein inhibitors of proteinases. Annu Rev Biochem 1980;49:593-626.
15. Radisky ES, Koshland, D. E. A clogged gutter mechanism for protease inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:10316-10321.
16. Park HS, Lin Q, Hamilton AD. Modulation of protein-protein interactions by synthetic receptors: Design of molecules that disrupt serine protease-proteinaceous inhibitor interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5105-5109.
17. Franco OL, Freitas SM, Santos RC, Batista JAN, Mendes ACM, Araujo MAM, Monnerat RG, Sá MFG. Effects of black-eyed pea trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor on proteolytic activity and on development of Anthonomus grandis. Phytochemistry 2003;63: 343-349.
18. Morhy L, Ventura MM. The complete amino-acid sequence of the Vigna-unguiculata (L) Walp seed trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor. An Acad Bras Cienc 1987;59:71-81.
19. Silva LP, Leite JRSA, Bloch C Jr, Freitas SM. Stability of a black eyed pea trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor (BTCI). Protein Peptide Lett 2000;7:397-401.
20. deFreitas SM, Mello LV, Silva MCM, Vriend G, Neshich G, Ventura MM. Analysis of the black-eyed pea trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor alpha-chymotrypsin complex. FEBS Lett 1997; 409:121-128.
21. Ventura MM, Mizuta K, Ikemoto H. Solvent perturbation and surface accessibility of the tryptophyl and tyrosyl groups in black-eyed pea trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor. An Acad Bras Cienc 1984;56:217-220.
22. Ventura MM, OliveiraMartim CD, Morhy L. Trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor from black-eyed pea (Vigna-sinensis L).6. Isolation and properties of complexes with trypsin and chymotrypsin. An Acad Bras Cienc 1975;47:335-346.
23. Ventura MM, Mizuta K, Ikemoto H. Self-association of the black-eyed pea trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor in solution-a study by light-scattering. An Acad Bras Cienc 1981;53:195-201.
24. Gottschalk M, Venu K, Halle B. Protein self-association in solution: The bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor decamer. Biophys J 2003;84:3941-3958.
25. Ventura MM, Xavier-Filho J. A trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitor from black-eyed pea (Vigna sinensis). I. Purification and partial characterization. An Acad Bras Cienc 1966;38:553-566.
26. Bittencourt SET, Silva LP, Azevedo RB, Cunha RB, Lima CMR, Ricart CAO, Sousa MV. The plant cytolytic protein enterolobin assumes a dimeric structure in solution. FEBS Lett 2003;549:47-51.
27. Brand GD, Leite JRSA, Silva LP, Albuquerque S, Prates MV, Azevedo RB, Carregaro V, Silva JS, Sá VCL, Brandãeo RA, Bloch C Jr. Dermaseptins from Phyllomedusa oreades and Phyllomedusa distincta-Anti- trypanosoma cruzi activity without cytotoxicity to mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2002;277:49332-49340.
28. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.
29. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 1996;14:51-55.
30. Miller S, Janin J, Lesk AM, Cyrus C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1987;196:641-656.
31. Janin J, Miller S, Chotia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1988;204:155-164.
32. Stawiski EW, Baucom AE, Lohr SC, Gregoret LM. Predicting protein function from structure: Unique structural features of proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:3954-3958.
33. Scheuring S, Ringler P, Borgnia M, Stahlberg H, Müller DJ, Agre P, Engel A. High resolution AFM topographs of the Escherichia coli water channel aquaporin Z. EMBO J 1999;18:4981-4987.
34. Wishart DS, Willard L, Richards FM, Sykes BD. VADAR: a comprehensive program for protein structure evaluation. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta; 1994; version 1.2.
35. Lee BK, Richards FM. Interpretation of protein structures-estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
36. Schneider SW, Larmer J, Henderson RM, Oberleithner H. Molecular weights of individual proteins correlate with molecular volumes measured by atomic force microscopy. Pflug Arch Eur J Phys 1998;43:362-367.
37. Yang Y, Wang H, Eriea DA. Quantitative characterization of biomolecular assemblies and interactions using atomic force microscopy. Methods 2003;29:175-187.
38. Harpaz Y, Gerstein M, Chothia C. Volume changes on protein-folding. Structure 1994;2:641-649.
39. Xue Y, Ratcli GC, Wang H, Davis-Searles PR, Gray MD, Erie DA, Redinbo MR. A minimal exonuclease domain of WRN forms a hexamer on DNA and possesses both 3′-5′ exonuclease and 5′-protruding strand endonuclease activities. Biochemistry 2002; 41:2901-2912.