Enhancing physicians' use of alcoholics anonymous: Internet-based training

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 77-86

  Sellers, Brealyn ^a   Galanter, Marc ^a   Dermatis, Helen ^a   Nachbar, Martin ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcoholics Anonymous; Internet training; Medical education

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADVERTIZING; ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHIATRIST; PUBLICATION;

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; INTERNET; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRY; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 27544481748     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v24n03_06     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chang G, Astrachan BM, Bryant KJ. Emergency physicians' ratings of alcoholism treaters. J Subst Abuse Treat 1994;11:131-5.
2. Watson, CG, Hancock M, Gearhart LP, Mendez CM, Malovrh P, Raden M. A comparative outcome study of frequent, moderate, occasional, and nonattenders of Alcoholics Anonymous. J Clin Psychol 1997; 53:209-14.
3. American Psychiatric Association, Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Substance Use Disorders: Alcohol, Cocaine. Opioids. 1995.
4. Humphreys K, Moos RH. Reduced substance abuse related health care costs among voluntary participants in Alcoholics Anonymous. Psychiatr Serv 1996;47: 709-13.
5. Hoffman NG, Chang AJ, Lewis DC. Medical student attitudes toward drug addiction policy. J Addict Dis 2000;19:1-12.
6. Nylenna M, Aasland O. Primary care physicians and their information seeking behavior. Scan J Prim Health Care 2000;18:9-13.
7. Casebeer L, Bennett N, Kristofco R, Carillo A, Centor R. Physician Internet medical information seeking and online continuing education use patterns. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:33-42.
8. Patten S. Prevention of depressive symptoms through the use of distance technologies. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:396-8.
9. Humphreys K, Klaw E. Can targeting nondependent problem drinkers and providing internet-based services expand access to assistance for alcohol problems? A study of the moderation management self-help/mutual aid organization. J Stud Alcohol 2001;62:528-32.
10. Galanter M, Keller D, Dermatis H, Biderman D. Use of the Internet for Addiction Education. Am J Addictions 1998 7;1:7-15.
11. Sklar B. The current status of online SME. Available at:www.netcantina. com/
12. Maleck M, Fischer M, Kammer B, Zeiler C, Mangel E, Chenk F, Pfiefer K. Do computers teach better? A media comparison study fro case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 2001;21:1025-32.
13. Pusic MV. Pediatric residents: are they ready to use computer-aided instruction? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:494-8.
14. Wright SM, Tseng WT, Kolodner K. Physician opinions about electronic publications. Am J Med 2001;110:373-7.
15. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services: Alcoholics Anonymous 1996 Membership Survey. New York, Alcohol Anonymous World Services, 1997.
16. Connors GJ, Tonigan JS, Miller WR. MATCH Researcg Group. A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, AA participation and outcome: retrospective study of the project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples. J Stud Alcohol 2001;62:817-25.
17. Watson, CG, Hancock M, Gearhart LP, Mendez CM, Malovrh P, Raden M. A comparative outcome study of frequent, moderate, occasional, and nonattenders of Alcoholics Anonymous. J Clin Psychol 1997; 53:209-14.
18. American Psychiatric Association, Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders. 2004.
19. Hoffman NG, Chang AJ, Lewis DC. Medical student attitudes toward drug addiction policy. J Addict Dis 2000;19(3):1-12.
20. Richardson ML, Morris TE. On-line delivery of continuing medical education over the World-Wide Web: an on-line needs assessment. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1161-4.
21. Steele D, Palensky J, Lynch T, Lacy N, Dully S. Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerized instruction. Med Educ 2002;36:225-32.