MESHI: A new library of Java classes for molecular modeling

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 20, 2005, Pages 3931-3932

  Kalisman, Nir ^a   Levi, Ami ^a   Maximova, Tetyana ^a   Reshef, Dan ^a   Zafriri Lynn, Sharon ^a   Gleyzer, Yan ^a   Keasar, Chen ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHIRALITY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SOLVATION; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 27544480322     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti630     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bull,M., Smith,L., Pottage,L. and Freeman,R. (2001) Benchmarking Java against C and Fortran for scientific applications. Proceedings of the 2001 joint ACM-SCOPE conference on Java Grade. ACM Press, CA, pp. 97-105.
2. Elber,R. et al. (1995) MOIL: A program for simulations of macromolecules. Comput. Phys. Commun., 91, 159-189.
3. Li,Z. and Scheraga,H.A. (1987) Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 6611-6615.
4. Liu,D.C. and Nocedal,J. (1989) On the limited-memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program., 45, 503-528.
5. Jorgensen,W.L. and Tiradorive,J. (1988) The OPLS potential function for proteins - energy minimization for crystals of cyclic-peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 1657-1666.
6. Prechelt,L. (1999) Comparing Java vs. C/C++ efficiency differences to interpersonal differences. Commun. ACM, 42, 109-112.
7. Vivanco,R.A. and Pizzi,N.J. (2005) Scientific computing with Java and C++: A case study using functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Softw. Pract. Exper., 35, 237-254.