Intelligent location of two simultaneously active acoustic emission sources

Aerospace Science and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-53

  Kosel, Tadej ^a   Grabec, Igor ^a   Kosel, Franc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Blind source separation; Defects; Non destructive testing; Source location

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION; CONVENTIONAL TRIANGULATION METHOD; NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING; SOURCE LOCATION;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING;

EID: 27544467565     PISSN: 12709638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2004.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. S.-I. Amari, Natural gradient works efficiently in learning, Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 251-276.
2. S.-L Amari, A. Cichocki, H.H. Yang, D. Touretzky, M. Mozer, M. Hasselmo, A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8 (1996) 752-763.
3. G. Burel, Blind separation of sources: a nonlinear algorithm, Neural Networks 5 (1992) 937-947.
4. Y.T. Chan, K.C. Ho, A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 42 (8) (1994) 1905-1915.
5. V. Cherkassky, F. Mulier, Learning from Data: Concepts Theory, and Methods, Wiley, New York, 1998.
6. Y. Deville, N. Charkani, Analysis of the stability of time-domain source separation algorithms for convolutively mixed signals, in: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1997. pp. 1835-1838.
7. B. Friedlander, A passive localization algorithm and its accuracy analysis, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. OE-12 (1) (1987) 234-245.
8. I. Grabec, Application of correlation techniques for localization of acoustic emission sources, Ultrasonics 16 (5) (1978) 111-115.
9. I. Grabec, B. Antolovič, Intelligent locator of AE sources, Progress in Acoustic Emission 7 (1994) 565-570.
10. I. Grabec, W. Sachse, Automatic modelling of physical phenomena: application to ultrasonic data, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (9) (1991) 6233-6244.
11. I. Grabec, W. Sachse, Synergetics of Measurement, Prediction and Control, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
12. A. Hyvarinen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications, Neural Networks 13 (2000) 411-430.
13. T. Kosel, I. Grabec, Intelligent locator of discrete and continuous acoustic emission sources, application of contemporary non-destructive testing in engineering, in: The 5th International Conference of Slovenian Society for Non-destructive Testing, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1998, pp. 39-54.
14. T. Kosel, I. Grabec, P. Mužič, Location of continuous acoustic emission sources generated by air flow, Ultrasonics 38 (1-8) (2000) 824-826.
15. M. Landa, Z. Převorovský, Acoustic emission signal edge detection, Copernicus project report, Institute of Thermomechanics, Praha, 1997.
16. T.-W. Lee, Independent Component Analysis, Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1998.
17. T.-W. Lee, A.J. Bell, R. Lambert, Blind separation of convolved and delayed sources, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9 (1997) 758-764.
18. P. McIntire, R.K. Miller, Acoustic Emission Testing, NDTH, vol. 5, ASNDT, Philadelphia, 1987.
19. D.F. Specht, A general regression neural network, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 2 (6) (1991) 568-576.
20. A. Tobias, Acoustic emission source location in two dimensions by an array of three sensors, Non-Destruc. Test 9 (2) (1976) 9-12.
21. A.G. Westner, Object-based audio capture: separating acousticallymixed sources, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MSc Thesis, 1996.
22. S.M. Ziola, M.R. Gorman, Source location in thin plates using cross-correlation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 (5) (1991) 2551-2556.