Grouping of amino acid types and extraction of amino acid properties from multiple sequence alignments using variance maximization

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 523-534

  Wrabl, James O ^a   Grishin, Nick V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid physical properties; Amino acid similarity; Principal components analysis

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; VARIANCE MAXIMIZATION;

AMINO ACIDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PLIABILITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 27544433454     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20648     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5: 113.
2. Pei J, Sadreyev R, Grishin NV. PCMA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment based on profile consistency. Bioinformatics 2003;19:427-428.
3. Venclovas C. Comparative modeling in CASP5: progress is evident, but alignment errors remain a significant hindrance. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):380-388.
4. Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone. Protein Sci 2002;11:1702-1713.
5. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
6. Copley RR, Russell RB. Getting the most from your protein sequence. Methods Mol Biol 2003;211:411-430.
7. Taylor WR. The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol 1986;119:205-218.
8. French S, Robson B. What is a conservative substitution? J Mol Evol 1983;19:171-175.
9. Dayhoff MO. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation; 1978.
10. Stanfel LE. A new approach to clustering the amino acids. J Theor Biol 1996;183:195-205.
11. Venkatarajan VS, Braun W. New quanitiative descriptors of amino acids based on multidimensional scaling of a large number of physical-chemical properties. J Mol Model 2001;7:445-453.
12. Kosiol C, Goldman N, Buttimore NH. A new criterion and method for amino acid classification. J Theor Biol 2004;228:97-106.
13. Li T, Fan K, Wang J, Wang W. Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping. Protein Eng 2003;16:323-330.
14. Cannata N, Toppo S, Romualdi C, Valle G. Simplifying amino acid alphabets by means of a branch and bound algorithm and substitution matrices. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1102-1108.
15. Murphy LR, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. Protein Eng 2000;13:149-152.
16. Esteve JG, Falceto F. A general clustering approach with application to the Miyazawa-Jernigan potentials for amino acids. Proteins 2004;55:999-1004.
17. Cieplak M, Holter NS, Maritan A, Banavar JR. Amino acid classes and the protein folding problem. J Chem Phys 2001;114:1420-1423.
18. Wang J, Wang W. A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1033-1038.
19. Kuznetsov IB, Rackovsky S. Discriminative ability with respect to amino acid types: assessing the performance of knowledge-based potentials without threading. Proteins 2002;49:266-284.
20. Solis AD, Rackovsky S. Optimally informative backbone structural propensities in proteins. Proteins 2002;48:463-486.
21. Wu TD, Brutlag DL. Discovering empirically conserved amino acid substitution groups in databases of protein families. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1996;4:230-240.
22. Trinquier G, Sanejouand YH. Which effective property of amino acids is best preserved by the genetic code? Protein Eng 1998;11: 153-169.
23. Tolstrup N, Toftgard J, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S. Neural network model of the genetic code is strongly correlated to the GES scale of amino acid transfer free energies. J Mol Biol 1994;243:816-820.
24. Wolfenden RV, Cullis PM, Southgate CC. Water, protein folding, and the genetic code. Science 1979;206:575-577.
25. Jukes TH. The amino acid code. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1978;47:375-432.
26. Sjostrom M, Wold S. A multivariate study of the relationship between the genetic code and the physical-chemical properties of amino acids. J Mol Evol 1985;22:272-277.
27. Hecht MH, Das A, Go A, Bradley LH, Wei Y. De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci 2004;13:1711-1723.
28. Riddle DS, Santiago JV, Bray-Hall ST, Doshi N, Grantcharova VP, Yi Q, Baker D. Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:805-809.
29. Kidera A, Konishi Y, Oka M, Ooi T, Scheraga HA. Statistical analysis of the physical properties of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids. J Protein Chem 1985;4:23-55.
30. Kinjo AR, Nishikawa K. Eigenvalue analysis of amino acid substitution matrices reveals a sharp transition of the mode of sequence conservation in proteins. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2504-2508.
31. Leary RH, Rosen JB, Jambeck P. An optimal structure-discriminative amino acid index for protein fold recognition. Biophys J 2004;86:411-419.
32. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:171-178.
33. Higgins DG. Sequence ordinations: a multivariate analysis approach to analysing large sequence data sets. Comput Appl Biosci 1992;8:15-22.
34. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, Pietrokovski S. Blocks+: a non-redundant database of protein alignment blocks derived from multiple compilations. Bioinformatics 1999;15:471-479.
35. Manly BFJ. Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1986.
36. Sunyaev SR, Eisenhaber F, Rodchenkov IV, Eisenhaber B, Tumanyan VG, Kuznetsov EN. PSIC: profile extraction from sequence alignments with position-specific counts of independent observations. Protein Eng 1999;12:387-394.
37. Pei J, Grishin NV. AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 2001;17:700-712.
38. Fauchere JL, Charton M, Kier LB, Verloop A, Pliska V. Amino acid side chain parameters for correlation studies in biology and pharmacology. Int J Pept Protein Res 1988;32:269-278.
39. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
40. Kawashima S, Kanehisa M. AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:374.
41. Anton H, Rorres C. Elementary linear algebra: applications version. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
42. Parker JM, Guo D, Hodges RS. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 1986;25:5425-5432.
43. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:206-209.
44. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981;147:195-197.
45. Sadreyev R, Grishin N. COMPASS: a tool for comparison of multiple protein alignments with assessment of statistical significance. J Mol Biol 2003;326:317-336.
46. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10915-10919.
47. Wold S, Eriksson L, Hellberg S, Jonsson J, Sjostrom M, Skagerberg B, Wikstrom C. Principal property values for six non-natural amino acids and their application to a structure-activity relationship for oxytocin peptide analogues. Can J Chem 1987;65:1814-1820.