PostDOCK: A structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 48, Issue 22, 2005, Pages 6821-6831

  Springer, Clayton ^a,b   Adalsteinsson, Helgi ^a   Young, Malin M ^a   Kegelmeyer, Philip W ^a   Roe, Diana C ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPLEX FORMATION; DATA BASE; ENERGY; FILTER; LEARNING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MACHINE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; POSTDOCK METHOD; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATA BANK; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

LIGANDS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 27444445346     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm0493360     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Orozco, M.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Mechanism for the rotamase activity of FK506 binding protein from molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 12864-12874.
2. Sham, Y. Y.; Chu, Z. T.; Tao, H.; Warshel, A. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA; LIE; PDLD-LRA; and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease. Proteins-Struct. Funct. Genet. 2000, 39, 393-407.
3. Zhang, L. Y.; Gallicchio, E.; Friesner, R. A.; Levy, R. M.; Guermeur, Y. et al. Solvent models for protein-ligand binding: Comparison of implicit solvent Poisson and surface generalized born models with explicit solvent simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 591-607.
4. Robinson, G. W.; Cho, C. H.; Urquidi, J. Isosbestic points in liquid water: Further strong evidence for the two-state mixture model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 698-702.
5. BenNaim, A. A measure of the average cooperativity of a binding system. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 7443-7449.
6. Lum, K.; Chandler, D.; Weeks, J. D. Hydrophobicity at small and large length scales. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4570-4577.
7. Wallqvist, A.; Covell, D. G. Cooperativity of Water-Solute Interactions at a Hydrophilic Surface. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 5705-5712.
8. Zou, X. Q.; Sun, Y. X.; Kuntz, I. D. Inclusion of solvation in ligand binding free energy calculations using the generalized-born model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8033-8043.
9. Majeux, N.; Scarsi, M.; Caflisch, A. Efficient electrostatic solvation model for protein-fragment docking. Proteins-Struct. Funct. Genet. 2001, 42, 256-268.
10. Shoichet, B. K.; Leach, A. R.; Kuntz, I. D. Ligand solvation in molecular docking. Proteins-Struct. Funct. Genet. 1999, 34, 4-16.
11. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524.
12. Shoichet, B. K.; Leach, A. R.; Kuntz, I. D. Ligand solvation in molecular docking. Proteins 1999, 34, 4-16.
13. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
14. Pang, Y. P.; Perola, E.; Xu, K.; Prendergast, F. G. EUDOC: A computer program for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1750-1771.
15. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
16. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
17. Bohm, H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. 1994, 8, 243-256.
18. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions 0.1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
19. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
20. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-Based Virtual Screening of Chemical Databases. 1. Evaluation of Different Docking/Scoring Combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
21. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45, 5-32.
22. Rusinko, A.; MW, F.; Lambert, C.; Brown, P.; Young, S. Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using rescursive partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
23. Holm, L.; Sander, C. The FSSP Database of Structurally Aligned Protein Fold Families. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 3600-3609.
24. Holm, L.; Sander, C. Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 231-234.
25. Ewing, T. J. A.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
26. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated Docking with Grid-Based Energy Evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524.
27. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C. et al. A New Force Field for Molecular Mechanical Simulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765-784.
28. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Organ. Magn. Reson. 1981, 15, 353-360.
29. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228.
30. Marsili, M.; Gasteiger, J. Croat. Chem. Acta 1980, 53.
31. Willett, P. Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Space; Research Studies Press: Letchworth.
32. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do Structurally Similar Molecular Have Similar Biological Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
33. Leo, A. Programs CLogP and CMR; BioByte Corp.: Claremont, CA.
34. Varshney, A.; Brooks, F. J. Fast Analytical Computation of Richard's Smooth Molecular Surface; UNC at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill, NC, 1993.
35. Eisenberg, D.; McLachlan, A. Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding. Nature 1986, 319, 199-203.
36. Trunk, G. V. A problem of Dimensionality: A Simple Example. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 1979, 1, 306-307.
37. Brunzell, H.; Eriksson, J. Feature reduction of classification of multidimensional data. Pattern Recog. 2000, 33, 1741-1748.
38. Cover, T. M.; Van Campenhout, J. M. On the possible ordering in the measurement selection problem. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernetics 1977, 7, 657-661.
39. Venables, W. N.; Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S-plus; Springer: New York, 1994.
40. McCullagh, P.; J. A., N. Generalized Linear Models; Chapman and Hall: London, 1989.
41. CRAN. The Comprehensive R Archive Network.
42. Duda, R.; Hart; Stark, P. Pattern Classification; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2001.