Using model-theoretic semantic interpretation to guide statistical parsing and word recognition in a spoken language interface

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2003-July, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Schuler, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORMAL LANGUAGES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION;

APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENT MODELS; INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS; MODEL-THEORETIC SEMANTICS; SEMANTIC GRAMMARS; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; SPOKEN-LANGUAGE INTERFACE; STATISTICAL PARSING; WORD RECOGNITION; WORLD MODEL;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 27344451549     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Tilman Becker, Aravind Joshi, and Owen Rambow. 1991. Long distance scrambling and tree adjoining grammars. In Fifth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'91), pages 21-26.
2. th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '89), pages 143-151.
3. Alonzo Church. 1940. A formulation of the simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(2):56-68.
4. John Dowding, Robert Moore, Frangois Andery, and Douglas Moran. 1994. Interleaving syntax and semantics in an efficient bottom-up parser. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94).
5. Aravind K. Joshi. 1985. How much context sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions: Tree adjoining grammars. In L. Karttunen D. Dowty and A. Zwicky, editors, Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives, pages 206-250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
6. Scott Miller, David Stallard, Robert Bobrow, and Richard Schwartz. 1996. A fully statistical approach to natural language interfaces. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'96), pages 55-61.
7. Richard Montague. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J.M.E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes, editors, Approaches to Natural Langauge, pages 221-242. D. Riedel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in R. H. Thomason ed., Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, 1994.
8. Carl Pollard. 1984. Generalized phrase structure grammars, head grammars and natural langauge. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
9. Owen Rambow, David Weir, and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1995. D-tree grammars. In Proceedings ofthe 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '95).
10. Uwe Reyle. 1993. Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: Construction, representation and deduction. Journal of Semantics, 10:123-179.
11. James Rogers. 1994. Capturing CFLs with tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '94).
12. Stephanie Seneff, Ed Hurley, Raymond Lau, Christine Pao, Philipp Schmid, and Victor Zue. 1998. GALAXY-II: a reference architecture for conversational system development. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '98), Sydney, Australia.
13. Stuart M. Shieber. 1994. Restricting the weak-generative capability of synchronous tree adjoining grammars. Computational Intelligence, 10(4).
14. David Weir. 1988. Characterizing mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
15. XTAG Research Group. 1998. A lexicalized tree adjoining grammar for english. Technical report, IRCS, University of Pennsylvania.