Adjacency selection in Markov Random Fields for high spatial resolution hyperspectral data

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 53-68

  Lagona, Francesco ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adjacency selection; Bayesian penalization rate; Hyperspectral data; Markov random fields; Pseudo likelihood

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 27344443977     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: 14355949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s101090100074     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Akaike II (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19:716-723
2. Amrhein C, Griffith DA (1997) Multivariate analysis for geographers. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
3. Besag JN (1974) Spatial interactions and the statistical analysis of Lattice data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 36:192-225
4. Bennett J, Khotanzad A (1998) Multispectral Random Field Models for Synthesis and Analysis of Color Images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3)
5. Crawford MM, Ricard M (1998) Hierarchical classification of SAR data using a Markov random field model. Southwest Symposium on Image Processing, Tucson, AZ:81-86
6. Cross GR, Jam AK (1983) Markov random field texture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1:25-39
7. Derin H, Howard E (1987) Modeling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-9(1):39-55
8. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-6:721-741
9. Geyer CJ, Thompson EA (1992) Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 54:657-699
10. Griffith DA, Lagona F (1998) On the quality of likelihood-based estimators in spatial autoregressive models when the data dependence structure is misspecified. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 69:153-174
11. Guyon X, Hardoum C (1992) The Chi2 difference of coding for testing Markov random field hypothesis. In: Barone P, Frigessi A (eds) Lecture Notes of Statistics. 74, Springer, NY, pp. 165-176
12. Guyon X (1995) Random Fields on a Network. Springer-Verlag, NY
13. Hoffbeck JP, Landgrebe D (1996) Classification of remote sensing images having high spectral resolution. Remote Sensing of Environment 57(3):119-126
14. Jacquez GM, Marcus WA, Aspinall RJ, Greiling DA (2002) Exposure assessment using high spatial resolution hyperspectral (HSRH) imagery. (In this issue). Journal of Geographical Systems 4:1-14
15. Ji C, Seymnour L (1998) A consistent model selection procedure for Markov random fields based on penalized likelihood. Annals of Applied Probability 6:423-443
16. Jona Lasinio G, Lagona F (2002) Automatic model choice for space-time data series. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society (submitted).
17. Kashyap R, Chellappa R (1983) Estimation and choice of neighbors in spatial interaction models of images. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 29:60-72
18. Kelly PA, Derin H, Hartt KD (1988) Adaptive segmentation of speckled images using a hierarchical random field model. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing. ASSP-36:1628-1641
19. Knorr-Held L, Besag J (1997) Modelling risks from a disease in time and space. NRCSE Technical Report Series 5:1-24
20. Lagona F (2001) Parametric restrictions in random fields for binary space-time series. Metron 59:73-97
21. Landgrebe D (2000) Information extraction principles and methods for multispectral and hyperspectral image data. In: Chen CH (ed) Information Processing for Remote Sensing. World Scientific Publishing Co, River Edge, NJ
22. Lee S, Crawford MM (1999) Unsupervised classification for multi-sensor data in remote sensing using Markov random field and maximum entropy method. Proceedings of the 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Hamburg, Germany:1200-1202
23. McCullagh P, Neider JA (1983) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London
24. Rignot E, Chellapa R (1992) Segmentation of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar data. IEEE Thansactions on Image Processing 1(3):281-300
25. Rose C, Devijver PA (1984) Connected components in binary images: the detection problem. Wiley, NY
26. Smith AFM and Roberts GO (1993) Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 55:3-23
27. Smits PC, Dellepiane SG (1997) Synthetic aperture radar image segmentation by a detail preserving Markov random field approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35(4):844-857
28. Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics 6:461-464
29. Tjelmeland H (1996) Modeling of the spatial facies distribution by Markov random fields. In: Baafi EY, Schofield NA (eds) Geostatistics Wollongong '96, Proceedings of the 5th International Geostatistical Congress, Wollongong, Australia, September 22-27, 1996, Kluwer Academic pp. 512-523
30. Tjelmeland H, Besag J (1998) Markov random fields with higher-order interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 25:415-433
31. Wackernagel H (1998) Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction With Applications (2nd Rev ed.). Springer-Verlag, NY
32. Zhang M, Haralick R, Campbell J (1990) Multispectral image context classification using stochastic relaxation. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics 20(1):128-140